Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WeAreChangeLA informs LA Sheriff Lee Baca about 9/11 Black Op Demolitions

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,624
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 7, 2009

Barack Obama was in Southern California over a few days in March 2009. After an event in Downtown Los Angeles on March 19, 2009, Jeremy Rothe-Kushel of WeAreChangeLA Citizen's Media asked the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Lee Baca, whether President Obama had mentioned clearing up the ongoing cover-up of the 9/11 black op.

"Did President Obama say anything--did he say anything about clearing up the biggest crime of the century, the 9/11 black op, and the continuing cover-up after it? Because we still have 30-something Angelenos whose murders are unsolved from that day and a lot of us, including all the family members,
want justice." Sheriff Baca, apparently confused, about what Rothe-Kushel was referring to, responded by asking "what is that again?"

Rothe-Kushel responded by saying "the 9/11... the black op. You know, like all the explosive evidence that the buildings were blown up from the inside out. Even Chief Bratton has connections with the security firm that must have allowed for these explosives to be placed. So, we're dealing with the biggest crime of the century that is completely unaccounted for, justice undone. So, did Obama say anything about clearing that up or was there any suggestion that we're going to deal with this?"

Sheriff Baca who initially appeared to be confused by what Rothe-Kushel was asking about, then, after receiving and glancing at an information card from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth- www.ae911truth.org - said that "nothing was mentioned about it." After being asked whether he was "familiar with this," Sheriff Baca responded by saying "No, I am not." Baca then proceeded to say he would check out the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth information card given to him, thanked Rothe-Kushel and continued the photo-ops with the card in his hand.
--------
The Sheriff of Counties all throughout the United States of America are supposed to be the ultimate enforcers of constitutional law in their respective areas. They need to know and act on all the ongoing and amplifying threats to the Constitution to which they swore their allegiance and further attacks upon the freedom and security of the human beings they have been entrusted with protecting.

Being that there were citizens of Los Angeles who were murdered on 9/11/01, Sheriff Baca has a responsibility to account for justice unfulfilled in regards to their murders and to make sure that nothing like that ever happens again to the people who depend on his enforcement of constitutional law. He appears to be interested in finding out about the truth, and that is a good place to start.

-------------
www.wacla.org
www.wearechange.org
www.truthaction.org
www.infowars.com
www.911blogger.com
www.historycommons.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.firefightersfor911truth.org
www.fealgoodfoundation.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.l911t.org

video: Jeremy Rothe-Kushel
edit: Jeremy Rothe-Kushel
music: Shumonik - www.myspace.com/shumonik

  • likes, 13 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I applaud what you are doing. God speed!

  • clean questioning

    clean delivery

    this confrontation video makes me want to join!

    this is how you question respectfully while still getting your point accross! MORE MORE MORE MORE

    MAS MAS MAS MAS MAS MAS

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • why is the sheriff taking pictures with people and giving a news conference on the street ? he is a cop not a celebrity

  • THIS KILLED MITRICE RICHARDSON

  • @gotama420 Really.  Well, thanks for the lesson in "civics." LOL!

  • @gotama420 I don't feel sorry for you. I don't feel sorry for your ignorance. What you don't know shows.

  • @gotama420 "what does thisa statement mean? You' ve got to be kidding.

  • @gotama420 Pragmatic? No, not really.

  • @gotama420 "Political" assumes adherence to an agenda, which may or may not be contradictory to the duty and obligation and elected official has to preserve, protect and defend the rights, privileges and commonwealth of the citizens' he or she serves. When that duty and obligation serves special interest and / or the agendas of those who do not subscribe to the liberties of the commonwealth, then in fact that person is acting in a "political" manner: aka, without conscious.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more