Re: Stanley Ketchel vs Jack Johnson
Loading...
473
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (PREZ150)
Video Responses
This video is a response to Stanley Ketchel vs Jack Johnson
see all
All Comments (13)
-
You are 100% right!
-
You are 100% right!
-
@devmaggie disagree on Jim the Jeffries part. Jim Jeffries himself stated he could have never beaten Johnson, even while in his prime. Also throughout the fight, If Jeffries were younger, he would have used the same "brawling" technique, which was ineffective against Johnson's defense. So, NO you are wrong, Johnson still would have whipped Jeffries ass if Jeffries was in his prime at the time at the so-called fight of the century.
-
Stupid = Dumb Ketchel got what deserve got his ass knock out.Plus with some teeth missing.
Loading...
would have been good to see Ketchel and Greb, but, my money would have been on Greb!
chaseybears 8 months ago
@chaseybears You better believe that kidoo.
PREZ150 7 months ago
To be fair, Ketchel should never had been in the ring with JJ, he wasnt big enough for a true heavyweight, but as a middleweight......he was dynamite!
chaseybears 8 months ago
@chaseybears That fight was a joke.And the joke was on Ketchel with his teeth stuck i Johnson glove after being knock the hell out.LOL
PREZ150 7 months ago
Not sure of why you posted this? You sound like you're very pleased with the outcome???? Jack Johnson is over rated. Sam Langford Joe Jennette and Sam Mcvey could have beaten him...but HE drew a color line. Refused to fight black fighters. And with that said, you know Jeffries in his prime would have outlasted him.
devmaggie 2 years ago
Maybe and maybe not.
PREZ150 2 years ago