Ron Paul: The Hope of America

Ron Paul is the only real candidate out there who can truly bring change for America. The results look very good so far, he placed third in Iowa, and placed second in New Hampshire.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ron
• Paul
• President
• United
• States
• of
• America
• Freedom
• Elections
• 2012
• Obama
• Media
• Establishment
• Politician
• Government
• Democrat
• Republican
• yt:stretch=16:9

[NaftaliRa]

Introduced a bill that would give every soldier active during the cold war a medal -- estimated by the DOD to cost $240 million -- and passing the cost directly to the taxpayer.

Ron Paul has published leaflets under his own name in the past that demonize blacks, jews and gays.

[SamiZaatari]

@NaftaliRa the argument is weak, you say this law would cost the DOD $240 million, but what you forget to mention is he also proposes to end all the wars, and end foreign military bases WHICH ARE COSTING THE DOD TRILLIONS, hence he will be saving the DOD trillions of dollars, so you have a problem that he wants a law that will only cost $240 million AFTER his cut backs save trillions of dollars for DOD? lol you obviously didn't think that argument out.

[La19000]

Paul wants to stop funding israel, which is good. coz the US tax should go to USA. not some douche who keeps making enemies for em.

[Invesigator]

Ron Paul is no angel. However, he is MUCH better to the alternatives.

[Zoulz666]

No single man will ever change anything. Ron paul better than the other candidates? Yes. But politics is not the way forward. Politics is a dying institution.

[ProgressiveAudio]

@1253bryan "Teddy R. was a progressive (Republican), and backed Taft because he thought he was a progressive who turned out to be a conservative."

Actually no,Teddy ran on the progressive party ticket and came in second place, the biggest win for a third party in US history.

[ProgressiveAudio]

@1253bryan "After better reading this, I see your view of history is skewed. Woodrow Wilson was the president who signed both the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the 16 Amendment."

Actually both the progressive income tax and monetary and banking regulations were promoted by Teddy Roosevelt while he was a republican and later progressive which the Democrats co-opted to win the election. State variants of these things happened under Republicans.

[1253bryan]

@ProgressiveAudio After better reading this, I see your view of history is skewed. Woodrow Wilson was the president who signed both the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the 16 Amendment. He was a democrat who was part of the progressive movement. Teddy R. was a progressive (Republican), and backed Taft because he thought he was a progressive who turned out to be a conservative. Your name said "progressive", so I jumped to conclusions, so for that I am sorry.

[ProgressiveAudio]

@1253bryan Yeah your reading comprehension is too...

[ProgressiveAudio]

@1253bryan "And no, neither were good developments, income tax, really? How is that good, were learn at a very young age stealing is wrong"

Oh, I am not about to get into an argument about taxes with a paultard :p. Just read rationalrevolution(.)net(/)war­(/)taxation(.)htm for an elementary rundown of what taxes are, since you need it.

[ProgressiveAudio]

@1253bryan "There were progressives bud, not matter what their party affiliation said. "

You said "your stupid fucking party" As far as I know, I'm not a member of the Republicans or any party for that matter. I guess you don't get why that was very stupid on your part.

FYI, there is only one active progressive party left in the US that has any representation, its the Prog partry of Vermont.

[1253bryan]

@ProgressiveAudio Wow, after posting that, I realized my grammar and punctuation is horrible

[1253bryan]

@ProgressiveAudio There were progressives bud, not matter what their party affiliation said. And no, neither were good developments, income tax, really? How is that good, were learn at a very young age stealing is wrong, but when we grow up the federal government takes half of our lifes earning, and for what? Failed programs, and politicians fat checks? Don't even get me started on the Federal Reserve.

[ProgressiveAudio]

@1253bryan Which party? The Republicans did both, and I think both were good developments, even if they were flawed, which only Paultards rage against like retards parroting their leaders.