Has history been tampered with? Why Archaeology finds nothing to support the Old Testament?

Has history been tampered with? The consensual history insists that all the events concerning the Biblical patriarchs occurred precisely and exclusively on the territory of the modern Mesopotamia and Syria.

Nevertheless, it is immediately acknowledged that "as to what concerns the identity of the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, one can just reiterate that the information obtained as a result of the most fruitful excavations in Syria and Mesopotamia was extremely meagre, or simply nonexistent".

One might wonder just how justifiable it is to search for traces of the Biblical patriarchs in modern Mesopotamia.

Archaeology as well as historical science in general can find no proof to the Biblical legend about the Egyptian slavery of the Jews.

The Egyptologist Wilhelm Spielberg tells us that "what the Bible reports about the plight of Israel in Egypt isn't any more of a historical fact than the accounts of Egyptian history related by Herodotus.. anyway, it is clear that the research concerning the Pharaoh under whose rule Israel moved into Egypt and left it represents nothing but the juggling of names and dates void of all meaning".

Could an altogether different country be described by the name of Egypt?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• given
• order
• national
• second
• possible
• per
• face
• form
• important
• early
• white
• black
• john
• case
• large
• need
• big
• children
• best
• ok

[mithec]

The history of religions runs as follows: the pre-Christian period (before the XI century and JC), Bacchic Christianity (XI-XII century, before and after JC), JC Christianity (XII-XVI century) and its subsequent mutations into Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, and Islam, right?

[prakkari]

Iceland is also a part of Europe. One of the most active volcanic spots in the world.

There are active volcanic sites all over the Mediterranean. One of the greatest erutions on earth in historic time was at the island of Thira (Santorini) around 1600 BC. The explosion there was about 4-5 the explosion in Krakatá. (Often called the Minoan eruption. Likely that many of the phenomena in the bible has its origin in that disaster.

This book is however a monumental heap of bullshit.

[iammrlee]

Alot of information are just to "big" to share with the masses. Thats why every country has national secrets that can only be declassify after 10-20 yrs later or maybe even never to be reviewed.

All history records are tampered with to some degree, but this author's idea is too far-fetched.

[infowolf1]

This is bullshit. there are several periods of famine

and disruption in Egypt any one could be Joseph's time

and a coupe could relate to the Exodus. OT is heavily

supported by archaeology. They keep finding more

things. Where did you get this crap?

[rabbichaimmoshe]

@Bullettube which hieroglyphics? who has the dictionary to them?do you know the inconsistencies of the hyroglyphics and the variant interpretations to them?

there is a large body of physical evidence of Jewish and Israelite statehood. palaces fortresses and copper smelting works all indicative of a vibrant Jewish existence in Biblical times.Assyria attacked Israel and recorded its victory but recorded only that it attacked Judea and locked it up as a bird-but Judea did not fall!

bible vindicti

[VendPrekmurec]

@rabbichaimmoshe Yahouda was a jew and a liar. Biblical history is a hoax . the "historians" ignore even Egyptian real historian Manetho...

[0450marlin]

@mithec Wrong.

[heckler171]

there is no such thing as a jewish diaspora so they dont even fit the bible prophecy those lairs. the only reason they are in america was because during slvaery they were envolved that is the same reason they are in brazil no other place beside europe and those to are they. but there is something as a black diaspora. omg if the jew god promiised them the holy land he sure is making them fight and die to get it.

[rabbichaimmoshe]

@mithec your egyptologist was a buffoon who never read a piece of hyroglifics without saying it denies the Bible. there is a good book that actually shows how inane

those egyptologists are.it is written by as Yahouda 1936 called proof of the accuracy of the Bible and he shows without question how the Biblical record is from egyptian contact of that time etc.. i suggest you read that b4 suggesting preposterous ideas

[heavyteen9]

sounds really worng. frist epyt was a derset not a huge rome greece and middle east thing. second rome and greece where the same. just differnt habits and gods. thrid the middle east was the frist form of anciet cilvaztion. fourth jesus was a real paerson and found christany. arrocding to history thougt he was from a tribe in england and came to rome. the goverment of rome then became shocked for the new relgion was destorying everything for them. but other resarch they say it was the jewish

[Bullettube]

This vid proves the old saying "that you can lead a horse to water but you can't make the horse drink". Egypt called itself "Egypt" and Rome called itself "Rome".

There are Egyptian hieroglyphics that plainly tell of the two wars between Egypt and Assyria and how the land we now call Israel was contested and conquered. The Assyrians (Babylonia) also recorded one of the "small" kingdoms they took from the Egyptians was the land we now call Palestine. Real science, real history, real true.

[thescorpionking2020]

shit on all religions they r all fuckin fake