..."Five fallen", as Vitelius, Galba, Otho,Vespasian, and Titus. And calls Domitian, the "one that is". This historic evidence by itself discredits your "work" as nothing but scholarly speculation, and indeed a fraud. You have demonstrasted that you are not competent to discuss this issue, nor the book of Revelation.
Dr. Gentry, I have already discredited you on another of your posts. The external evidence is overwhelming, that the book of Revelation was written AFTER John's release from Patmos, in the "end" of 96 A.D (that means it was written in 97 A.D.) Jerome's commments on the dating of John's banishment to Patmos, reveals that it was in the 14th year of Domitian. This evidence is "damning" to your false presumption. Victorinus, in his comment on the "Apocalypse" (Rev.17:10) refers to the ...
Hey sorens 70601, show a little christian love, how about?
chrisvanallsburg 2 weeks ago
..."Five fallen", as Vitelius, Galba, Otho,Vespasian, and Titus. And calls Domitian, the "one that is". This historic evidence by itself discredits your "work" as nothing but scholarly speculation, and indeed a fraud. You have demonstrasted that you are not competent to discuss this issue, nor the book of Revelation.
sorens70601 2 weeks ago
Dr. Gentry, I have already discredited you on another of your posts. The external evidence is overwhelming, that the book of Revelation was written AFTER John's release from Patmos, in the "end" of 96 A.D (that means it was written in 97 A.D.) Jerome's commments on the dating of John's banishment to Patmos, reveals that it was in the 14th year of Domitian. This evidence is "damning" to your false presumption. Victorinus, in his comment on the "Apocalypse" (Rev.17:10) refers to the ...
sorens70601 2 weeks ago