Cure for pseudoskeptics ?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,364
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 26, 2009

A proffered solution for the deep unhappiness evident in pseudoskeptics.
A better internal life for them.

It might help them stop reflexively biting people's ankles :D

  • likes, 29 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (492)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i knew,that was my last performance in mettalica.

  • @sonnygll "A species does not necessarily go extinct after another evolves from it." HAR HAR HAR you idiot. No species has EVER evolved from another. Have you lost your rabbit mind?

  • @vadimcream NO he is not Kimbo Imain Sydney FSAPTHEIST is Scotland I think

  • @vadimcream Its just heterophobia what you do here

  • @sonnygll And you are practising heterophobia with your swarm group. All blocked and swatted like flies.

  • @sonnygll I learned that in high school You are attmepting to carry on another persons conversation. While he spams AA s entries. That conversation is finished. Vadim simple met a real skeptic. He should be grateful not spiteful

  • @sonnygll

    If you turn around and say that you cannot prove them because there is not enough time then that is a problem for you.

    Merriam Webster- Faith-Belief in something for which there is no proof.

    You won't be able to prove them thus you have faith whether you like it or not.

  • @sonnygll We are back to the questions.

    When was a living organism observed to come into being from non living matter all on its own without any intelligent intervention?

    When did scientists observe amphibian to reptile evolution occuring by naturalistic mechanisms/Processes?

    Where were they proven?

    

  • @sonnygll

    "I was taught and so were my contemporaries. And

    so were the younger scientists. Evolution was defined as 'changes in gene frequencies' in natural populations. The accumulation of genetic mutations were touted to be enough to change one species to another. . No. It wasn’t dishonesty. I think it was wish-fulfillment and social momentum. Assumptions, made but

    not verified, were taught as fact.”

    Lynn marguilis

  • @sonnygll

    Variation within existing traits is no more going to cause new morphological traits to appear amymore than shuffling around chinese letters will bring you the english alphabet.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more