@sonnygll "A species does not necessarily go extinct after another evolves from it." HAR HAR HAR you idiot. No species has EVER evolved from another. Have you lost your rabbit mind?
@sonnygll I learned that in high school You are attmepting to carry on another persons conversation. While he spams AA s entries. That conversation is finished. Vadim simple met a real skeptic. He should be grateful not spiteful
so were the younger scientists. Evolution was defined as 'changes in gene frequencies' in natural populations. The accumulation of genetic mutations were touted to be enough to change one species to another. . No. It wasn’t dishonesty. I think it was wish-fulfillment and social momentum. Assumptions, made but
Variation within existing traits is no more going to cause new morphological traits to appear amymore than shuffling around chinese letters will bring you the english alphabet.
i knew,that was my last performance in mettalica.
garciaalvin3 1 month ago
@sonnygll "A species does not necessarily go extinct after another evolves from it." HAR HAR HAR you idiot. No species has EVER evolved from another. Have you lost your rabbit mind?
MaximusArurealius 3 months ago
@vadimcream NO he is not Kimbo Imain Sydney FSAPTHEIST is Scotland I think
kimbo99 3 months ago
@vadimcream Its just heterophobia what you do here
kimbo99 3 months ago
@sonnygll And you are practising heterophobia with your swarm group. All blocked and swatted like flies.
kimbo99 3 months ago
@sonnygll I learned that in high school You are attmepting to carry on another persons conversation. While he spams AA s entries. That conversation is finished. Vadim simple met a real skeptic. He should be grateful not spiteful
kimbo99 3 months ago
@sonnygll
If you turn around and say that you cannot prove them because there is not enough time then that is a problem for you.
Merriam Webster- Faith-Belief in something for which there is no proof.
You won't be able to prove them thus you have faith whether you like it or not.
FSApetheist 3 months ago
@sonnygll We are back to the questions.
When was a living organism observed to come into being from non living matter all on its own without any intelligent intervention?
When did scientists observe amphibian to reptile evolution occuring by naturalistic mechanisms/Processes?
Where were they proven?
FSApetheist 3 months ago
@sonnygll
"I was taught and so were my contemporaries. And
so were the younger scientists. Evolution was defined as 'changes in gene frequencies' in natural populations. The accumulation of genetic mutations were touted to be enough to change one species to another. . No. It wasn’t dishonesty. I think it was wish-fulfillment and social momentum. Assumptions, made but
not verified, were taught as fact.”
Lynn marguilis
FSApetheist 3 months ago
@sonnygll
Variation within existing traits is no more going to cause new morphological traits to appear amymore than shuffling around chinese letters will bring you the english alphabet.
FSApetheist 3 months ago