@jfb17042 i dont think any one who has ever owned or even ridden 1 has had a goog word to say about them,the rm series are much better as you quite rightly say
@jfb17042 i assume you have heard of the suzuki tm 400 [r] mxer from the 70s?.a brilliant example of everything a moto x bike SHOULD NOT be.lethal,dangerous and nasty does not even begin to describe it
@jfb17042 that is fantastic.i bet the 500 is an absoloute animal when it really gets into its stride....and i would imagine it could melt goggles at 50 paces
i mgetting one of them
MrHicksw 3 days ago
@jfb17042 i dont think any one who has ever owned or even ridden 1 has had a goog word to say about them,the rm series are much better as you quite rightly say
damo9811 1 month ago
@damo9811 I not only have heard of them, I have owned a 1974 TM400. I didn't like it very much. I had a 1976 RM 250 that was a much better bike.
jfb17042 1 month ago
@jfb17042 i assume you have heard of the suzuki tm 400 [r] mxer from the 70s?.a brilliant example of everything a moto x bike SHOULD NOT be.lethal,dangerous and nasty does not even begin to describe it
damo9811 1 month ago
@jfb17042 i can imagine.does it come with an ejection seat.ha ha
damo9811 1 month ago
@damo9811 Yes its a 500cr MXer, Very fast.
jfb17042 1 month ago
@jfb17042 that is fantastic.i bet the 500 is an absoloute animal when it really gets into its stride....and i would imagine it could melt goggles at 50 paces
damo9811 1 month ago
@damo9811 250,360,390,430,500 all are 2stroke
jfb17042 1 month ago
@jfb17042 nice 1.what size engines and were they a mix of 2stroke and 4 stroke?
damo9811 1 month ago
@damo9811 They stopped making them in Sweden in 1987. I have 12 of them from 1971 to 1985.
jfb17042 1 month ago