Nathan Lane, John Goodman, and the Cast of Waiting for Godot
Loading...
Loading...
9,771
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 6:13Daniel Radcliffe Interview, Star of Broadway's ...by theatermania229,354 views
- 5:29Geoffrey Rush, Susan Sarandon and Interviews wi...by theatermania2,330 views
- 3:57Jeremy Irons, Joan Allen and interviews with th...by theatermania1,190 views
- 4:47Matthew Broderick and the Cast of The Philanthr...by theatermania4,092 views
- 7:43Waiting for Godotby seanjcameron8,367 views
- 6:44Waiting for Godot (ending)by timothygleason33,754 views
- 2:53John Goodman on Sesame Streetby sawing14s75,389 views
- 2:13Waiting for Godot starring Ian McKellenby swprnz16,069 views
- 6:47Ellen Degeneres Show Nathan Lane (part 1/2)by nana00198646,789 views
- 2:53John Goodman-Sweet Home Chicagoby DaisyJen6,835 views
- 6:25Nathan Lane As The Cowardly Lion Sings 'If I On...by Titaniacy28,157 views
- 5:16Rik & Ade - Waiting for Godotby BolshyBigYarbles5,841 views
- 3:12Waiting For Godotby Orishanla43,897 views
- 0:31Skin Bracer TV ad with John Goodmanby bodhrantipper16,825 views
- 4:58Nathan Lane- serenade to Conan O'Brienby mturka1816,299 views
- 3:31Nathan Lane discusses meeting Oprahby Taxgirl3823,784 views
- 0:52Waiting For Godot - Matthew Kelly as 'Pozzo' (2...by WaitingForGodot20103,611 views
- 1:21Nathan Lane and Laurie Metcalf in NOVEMBER by D...by poldark462025,892 views
- 0:30John Goodman for safe levees in the USAby LeveesOrg29,293 views
Veeerrryyyy interesting observation by Glover that there would never have been "Seinfeld" without "Godot".
major600 8 months ago
Aw, Nathan Lane was Estragon? Maaaaan, I always thought that he'd be better as Didi.
IndianaJoker 9 months ago
@motorizedlamb I agree, however Beckett himself even made it clear that it WAS pronounced God-o.
IndianaJoker 9 months ago
@ridleyfilms I think this comment would make Beckett role in his grave. The specifics of pronunciation hardly matter, it's not going to change the play's content or message, I think it's a silly thing to get hung-up on.
motorizedlamb 1 year ago
Does anyone know where i could see this version with the cast?
JerryAtricSenior 1 year ago
I was in a production of this play this year, and played Pozzo. My interpretation of the character is different from Goodman's (I played him as actually evil, not just a windbag), but I'd still love to see him do it. And Glover as Lucky? Never saw that coming, but I bet it'd be good.
KartarNighthawk 2 years ago
somehow i can really see him as an amazing Estragon.... I'm quite happy. Now i just need to see this :S booo being broke. :|
ambalakshmi 2 years ago
The beauty and genius of this show is that every single part of it is entirely open for interpretation, with no wrong answers. Also, it's wickedly funny and can really only be done by comic actors for full effect. I saw this production; Nathan Lane was marvelously over the top, Bill Irwin is the god of all clowns, John Goodman is the perfect pompous windbag (as his character is), and John Glover did a fantastic job as Lucky (500 word monologue, no punctuation. His only lines in the show).
Veggieman87 2 years ago
No problem. I love the theatre too. Reading the play will not give anything away. It will only enhance your experience and appreciate the decisions the actors/director have made to make it come together. The set designer had a pretty cool vision too.
TABWISH 2 years ago
I'll have to make sure I see it and read it (I have a copy at home). I'm a big theater buff. Thanks for responding!
myjourn 2 years ago