9/11 - United 175 CGI Plane Theory Debunked

Exposing heavy pseudo-science behind so called "CGI planes" Conspiracy Theory, which claims no real passenger airplanes hit their targets on 9/11 2001, but instead, computer generated objects were planted in photographic and video evidence.
Despite its obvious insanity, the theory still does not mark the limit of imagination of 9/11 truthers.
From foreknowledge/"Let it happen on purpose"/inside job theory to "Aliens did 9/11", Conspiracy Theories reflect wide spectrum of human psychology.

The high quality video clip I used here comes from
www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html
File name: 2nd-hit_WNYW_FOX5_DrEbbetts.avi


For more information, please visit:
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 9/11
• September
• 11
• 2001
• terrorist
• attacks
• United
• Airlines
• UA
• Flight
• 175
• conspiracy
• theory
• CGI
• phantom
• planes
• WTC
• World
• Trade
• Center
• NYC
• New
• York
• City

[edawg781]

9/11 WAS an inside job, the planes were real, the people were real, the videos were real. Anybody who says the planes were holograms are fools. Should the WTC have collapsed the way they did? NO, there was deff some sort of pyrotechnics involved

[BlisterHiker]

@edawg781

How do you know the WTC should not collapse that way? Are you a structural engineer? Could I take a look at some publication which confirms that?

Unless you show something solid, I prefer to trust my own education and vast majority of scientific and engineering community. Those people know what they talk about, unlike 9/11 so-called truthers.

Collapses of WTC 1, 2 and 7 were physical consequences of damage those buildings sustained and fires.

[TheMostAwesomeMan242]

all you conspiracy theorists out there can kiss my ass. btw to uploader: good job. i can see a black line going across the smoke/haze which is the second plane.

[24547377]

These no planers are starting to piss me off. I saw with my own eyes 175 hit the tower. I was there at the time. The plane flew virtually over me as it came in, i looked up and followed it in. My sister was screaming as we both realised what was going to happen. So if idid'nt see a plane what did i see? Iam English and on my fist visit to America so i am not part of the goverment. I also belive the goverment has not told the truth.

[BlisterHiker]

@Sbvangede

Please try to employ some common sense.

If there are perfectly valid explanations for some event which are confirmed by large and publically available evidence (witnesses, footage and pictures from many sources, scientific reviewed publications available to everyone on Internet), relying on junk science, speculations and lies is not very smart.

Politics has always been dirty business all over the world, but that does not give you, Conspiracy Theorists, any credit.

[Sbvangede]

For some strange reason i cant post links here anymore.. I was never taking about about building 7. Only 1 and 2. And where is you "Peer-Reviewed" data to back up your statement? Oh yeah it dosent exist..... Hope youll soon wake up

[BlisterHiker]

@Sbvangede

Collapse of WTC 7 has been very well explained by NIST and accepted by 99.99% of American and international scientific and engineering community.

Nobody heard any explosions before or during collapse. Nobody saw any flashes or signs of thermal demolition.

WTC 7 was heavily damaged from south side by debris from WTC 1. Fires did the rest. Finally, when weakened structure failed around the column 79.

Have you go any more lies that other "truthers" put in your head?

[BlisterHiker]

@Sbvangede

Harrit or prof. Jones did not prove existence of nanothermites. Their claims have been debunked.

It is you who should wake up because they make fools of people like you.

The residues which were found in WTC debris, were leftovers of paint used on steel beams and welding made during construction of the WTC.

Prof. Harrit lost the rest of his credibility when he said hundreds of tons of conventional explosives were used as well, which is complete nonsense.

Educate yourself.

[Sbvangede]

@BlisterHiker and if you wanna hear a "real" scientist

watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o Its time for you to wake up!!

[Sbvangede]

@BlisterHiker h t t p:// 911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analy­sis/compare/fires.html Do you own research.. You cant cast everything that isnt what the mainstream media says away as a conspiracy.. You ever heard about the "Murdoch" scandal??

[BlisterHiker]

@Sbvangede

Burn "to the ground"? What are you talking about?

Proven they couldn't collapse such way? Proven by whom? Did that person publish his analysis and had it reviewed? If so, show me title and date of publication.

You should educate yourself. Visit debunking911 . com, for example, and learn something real instead of those lies you've seen in some conspiracy video or website.