Relgion of Evolution

The theory of evolution is a religion based on faith. Because the evidence is weak and contradictory, it might be considered blind faith. Bible straight-talk is clear.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolution
• religion
• evolution weak
• contradictory
• faith

[gregrutz]

Darwin was wrong about gradual and uniform. He did not know about the great mass extinctions of the past. His ideas are 150 years out of date.

Anyone who says

1.Evolution is by chance

2.there is no evidence for evolution

3. so it is accepted by faith and

4 is a religion

IS AN IDiot !

[gregrutz]

@cootsfortruth The TRUTH is evolution has been proven and the bible was proven wrong by Galileo hundreds of years ago.

Now what are you going to do?

[cootsfortruth]

The challenge in this discussion is simple: If the Bible is true, evolution is false. If the Bible is not true, this discussion is a worthless use of "whatever" time is...and there is no hope in this world.

The Bible is the only reliable, verifiable history of the world from the creation to the first century. And Jesus Christ was a real person who died on a cross and was raised.

By the way...Why is time measured from the birth of Christ Jesus.

[cootsfortruth]

The challenge in this discussion is simple: If the Bible is true, evolution is false.

If the Bible is not true, this discussion is a worthless use of whatever time is...and there is no hope in this world.

The Bible is the only reliable, verifiable history of the world from the creation to the first centure.

By the way...Why is time measured from the years of the birth of Christ Jesus.

[TheSeventhSon]

@friendsfortruth

Yeah, I did. Plenty of Christian sources that provide no scientific investigation. How convenient, right? Oh yeah, Christians hate to use science because it often proves Christians to be wrong.

I know it's uncommon. Specific conditions need to be met for fossilization.

The way you die doesn't affect a radioactive decay rate. Once again, you don't know what you're talking about. Are you just going to continue arguing out of ignorance?

[friendsfortruth]

@TheSeventhSon

If you want more info, google Incan Burial Stones.

Fossilization is an uncommon happening. Normally animal die, are eaten or left to die. They are left to the normal decay process.

Animals buried alive in the huge graveyards caused by the catostrophic Noah flood did not die naturally.

Most of the fossils are found in huge water-laid graveyards with all kinds of animals buried together...come in the process of being eaten.

[TheSeventhSon]

@friendsfortruth

Nothing changes the speed of decay. Did you not read what I wrote? A Christian team attempted to find evidence for transient decay rates.

You do realize that if it was known that decay rates could be altered, that knowledge would be coveted.

I'm pretty sure if water and mud affected decay rates, scientists would have figured that out long ago. That's quite a simple experiment to do.

It's probably considered a hypothesis because of where you got that info.

[TheSeventhSon]

@friendsfortruth

Nothing changes the speed of decay. Did you not read what I wrote? A Christian team attempted to find evidence for transient decay rates.

You do realize that if it was known that decay rates could be altered, that knowledge would be coveted.

I'm pretty sure if water and mud affected decay rates, scientists would have figured that out long ago. That's quite a simple experiment to do.

It's probably considered a hypothesis because of where you got that info.

[friendsfortruth]

@TheSeventhSon

Here is a quote: "The laws of radioactive decay hypothesize that once a living organism is dead, it no longer interacts with anything in its environment which would affect the speed of its radioactive decay."

How would an animal drowned in a flood react to its invironment...before and after it died? It would surely be affected by being buried in the layer of mud and so many other animals.

Why is radiocarbon decay still called a "hypothesis"? Hmmmm!

(More on decay.)

[TheSeventhSon]

@friendsfortruth

Not to mention various aquatic life, plant life, insects, etc. You seriously think that two of every species of everything could fit on a boat? You're kidding yourself.