SC-1 SeaHawk Seaplane Fighters in Combat Operations!

YOU DO NOT NEED AIRCRAFT CARRIERS TO HAVE AIRCRAFT AT SEA.

Read that over and over again until you get it into your head. At one time the U.S. Navy had a war to help win and knew what RIGHT LOOKED LIKE. It had DISPERSED air power on cruisers, battleships and even destroyers that could launch INSTANTLY from catapults to get air power overhead and out in front of the fleet to find the enemy first to develop the situation in our favor and to keep submarines and enemy scout/attack aircraft away.




http://www.combatreform.org/seaplanefighters.htm

Ever since 1960, the greedy, incompetent aircraft carrier floating quasi-air base (a real air base would be a MOB that can operate real land planes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKgft_gqchA

...not compromised flight performance CATBAR tail-hook ones) bureaucracy has racketeered BS aircraft carriers that cannot even keep F-18 Stupor Hornet fighter-bombers overhead to stop Iranian UAVs from flying overhead and relaying targeting data to all sorts of guided carrier-killing munitions.

http://www.combatreform.org/usnavyindanger.htm

Yet, we still pack 5, 000 welfare recipient victims (watch PBS mini-series "Carrier") on board these stupor carrier deathtraps because the lying aircraft carrier racketeers keep on feeding this crap that this is the ONLY way to get air power to sea. This video contradicts their lies showing a SC-1 SeaHawk SEAPLANE FIGHTER that can not only scout ahead but shoot-down other enemy fighters even with floats attached like the Jap Rufe seaplane fighter did to us early in the war.

Seaplane fighters of clever designs that don't compromise flight performance one iota like the SeaDart can and should be operated by ALL our ships not this insane reliance on BS stupor carriers that will be sunk in a matter of hours in an all-out, shooting war against capable foes. If the Navy brass want to sacrifice 5, 000 dead sailors and marines to insure the American people are pissed off so we go to war to feed their racket--well that's pretty damn sick--and it is they who we should focus our attention on first for their DELIBERATE incompetence.

Thanks to youtube user UnknownWW2InColor for finding this rare footage!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• sc-1
• seahawk
• seaplane
• fighter
• WW2
• usn
• scout
• attack
• cruisers
• battleships
• air
• cover
• catapult
• launch

[doorslol3]

then why not make a ramp at the back of the ship??? , plane taxi's on that thing to hold it and a cable cable hoists the entire thing out of the water over the ramp (back of ship) on the afterdeck... i think that is simple enouf to work maybe easier for the pilot =D

Sorry for quiq typing and bad english =P

[dynmicpara]

EXCELLENT IDEA! Good work. You are very right.

[biukucanoe]

an aircraft like this still has better peformance than a helo, but it is much harder to recover.