Vado HD vs Samsung CL65 - Video Comparison (Skydiving at Eloy)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,906
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 31, 2010

Skydiving at Eloy Municipal Airport in Arizona

A side by side video comparison of the zoom and image quality of the Samsung CL65 and the Vado HD second generation.

(Both recorded at 720p - the sound is from the Vado)

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (APrintezis)

  • Vado is cripser in pretty much all your videos, but it's color has a tint or hue the others don't have. If it wasn't for that, I'd say Vado hands down.

    Wonder if the lens on the vado is higher quality than the rest.

  • yes, that's exactly right .. crisp but with some high-constast and hue issues.

    it is a trade off - the 3rd gen does not have the hue issue but it lost it's crispness (such a shame)

    no, i don't think it is the lens, which are very nice and wide angle anyway, i think it is the compression (the data bit rate is about 8.5 Mbps), it takes a bit more memory space but the result is nicer.

see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @APrintezis a simple enhancer on the pc can fix all hue issues

  • Wow, that's funny. The first person to land is me in this video. Random

  • Vado looks the best. The other one looks washed out, dull colors, etc.

  • Vado wins again! I love the widescreen on it!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more