JFK: The Mysterious Death of Number Thirty-Five, Part One

A New Perspective on the Kennedy Assassination. Part One. Join researcher Pat Speer as we re-examine the evidence in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Directed by Braddon Mendelson.

All four episodes now on DVD, plus bonus features:

http://www.noisivision.com/jfk

Copyright © 2007 Noisivision, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jfk
• kennedy
• assassination
• oswald
• conspiracy
• motorcade
• dallas
• film
• speer
• pat
• noisivision
• yt:quality=high

[frankster47]

JFK's assassination was the start of America's downfall. It has been wars and

lies ever since.

[PatSpeer]

Joe, you're missing something. First of all, the autopsy doctors said the bullet descended in the body and that no bone was hit in the neck. They needed to say this because the sniper's nest was above Kennedy and the NOSE of the magic bullet was unblemished. Only later did the gov.t's experts acknowledge the spine was damaged, and that the bullet ascended the neck. But an upwards deflection would have missed Connally. So they pretended JFK was leaning forward, even though they knew he was not.

[MetaIhead89]

government is corrupt, that's a fact.

[astranine]

The Doctors at Parkland Hospital were the leading experts on gunshot wounds in the country at that time.

[1239jer]

@TakeBackAmerica2012 "Deemed to be doctored"? There were concluded to be authentic by the HSCA. They concluded a) the x-rays and photos were not doctored, b) the person in the photos is JFK. Then the forensic pathologists concluded the wounds were consistent with the autopsy testimony from the WC, save for the precise location of the rear entry head wound.

Those who claim the photos were "doctored" a) haven't had access to the originals, and/or b) have no expertise in this field.

[TakeBackAmerica2012]

@1239jer The autopsy photos that were in the national archives were deemed to be doctored! Look it up!

And they were not doctored in favor of a right rear head wound, they were doctored to prop up the Warren Commission.

[1239jer]

@TakeBackAmerica2012 Why do the CTs focus on the Dallas doctors? Because they know the pathologists, the photos and the x-rays tell a different story. THEY have an agenda - to sow doubt about the US government, to sell books. I bought the line for 20+ years, until I actually looking closer at the line they promoted. I don't doubt your sincerity (even if you question mine), but I hope some day you look at ALL the evidence and reach the same epiphany I did.

[1239jer]

@TakeBackAmerica2012 The bottom line here is: a) some Dallas doctors in fact DID see head wounds as the WC described them; b) ALL the forensic pathologists (included Wecht), with 100,000+ autopsies amongst themselves were unequivocal - two rear entry wounds, one to the back, one to the head, a throat exit wound, a the right front side of the head blown out. Wecht has ALWAYS (since seeing the photos and x-rays in, I think, 1972) agreed with this, though he thought other bullets may have struck.

[1239jer]

@TakeBackAmerica2012 TBA - Is it a "fact" or is it not a fact that "all" Dallas doctors saw a rear exit wound? I listed FIVE doctors who said "no," so it is not a fact. Search the names. Did the Dallas doctors "NEVER" waver from their position? Some in fact did - some in that list, which is the basis for the CTs rejection of their later clarification of what they saw.

Agenda? I am Canadian! I don't give a damn if the government was behind it or not!

[TakeBackAmerica2012]

@1239jer You are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts. The Dallas doctors NEVER wavered from their original findings. There was also an RN that saw everything and has gone on record, she says the same thing the doctors do. Stop trying to revise history to meet a political agenda.

[1239jer]

@TakeBackAmerica2012 "Dr Wecht has never wavered..." Yes. From the earl 70s, he has stated, unequivocally, that there was a rear entry wound to the head and to the back and said there is NO rear exit wound. He DOES believe there were multiple gunmen. He has vacillated on other possible wounds - a simultaneous wound to the head by a shattering bullet from the front, but he concedes there is no medical evidence for this.

[1239jer]

@TakeBackAmerica2012 Further, since they were not pathologists, they didn't know what they were looking at, as some mentioned already later admitted. They mistook crenelated cerebrum tissue as cerebellum tissue, a main reason for the confusion.

"My God... didn't turn over..." Virtually all the personnel only saw JFK while on his back and had left when his body was put into the coffin. They knew he was dead. They did what they could. Others would do the autopsy.