Creation is a Scientific Fact - P2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,312
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 14, 2009

Having firmly established that the universe has a beginning and thus a supernatural cause - we now examine the amazing evidence that this supernatural cause fine tuned the universe for carbon based life.

Here is a link to Dr Gerald Schroeder's explanation of the age of the universe and the 7 day creation account:
http://www.geraldschroeder.com/age.html

  • likes, 57 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bigwhammyRocks)

  • The video's are good, it points out that science (itself a tool) logically leads us to conclude that there must be something supernatural beyond nature itself. So who created God? He's God, he created the natural rules, He didn't need a creator. That is why He is supernatural - He is beyond natural. So it is stupid and illogical to try and say a Supernatural God is bound by natural limitations. If He was bound by them He could hardly be God. Science is only a tool, it has its limitations.

  • I believe you get it. Thank you!

  • the video contradicts itself,..everything that exists must have a creator,..doesnt make any sense,..who created god? was it his god? why look at something so complex and fill in how it got there with something even more complex?? creationists logic..god exists and is a highly complex design with ultimate power,..therefore he is a design,..he must require a designer. the godmakers must have designed god :0

  • "everything that exists must have a creator"

    Wow straw man much? I never said that. Please attempt to  communicate without using logical fallacies.

see all

All Comments (177)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA ans read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boso­­n-or-god-particle-which-exist­-­in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist atr welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology

    vk sonakia

    unified field scientist

    bhopal

    INDIA

    vksonakia@yahoo.co.in

  • Why are religious creationists so afraid of science - particularly cosmogony, abiogenesis and evolution?

    Why don't they quietly prostrate with or to their imaginary friend instead of publicly embarrassing themselves?

  • it was not an explosion it was an expansion 

  • Ho boy. Here we go again.

    0:35 - The Big Bang was not an explosion.

    1:50 - The Big Bang theory has fulfilled numerable predictions, which is why it is supported by the vast majority of Cosmologists today, and was supported by Fred Hoyle himself.

    3:30 - This is the 'False Lottery" fallacy: there is no evidence that the Big Bang could have ANY variation in it's 'ripple' measurements. Thus, there is no evidence for fine tuning.

  • Thank you for proving that Zeus had a hand on the creation of the universe

  • @FURRYDulaman It's only described as an explosion because of the mass amount of change it brought about. An explosion of words from ones mouth is an expression of information quickly taking form where there was nothing before. So think of the big bang as nothingness, and then even an existence of a sigular atom would be on the scale of an explosion due to the fact that nothing constituted what was once before. Galaxies didn't form until much later than the focal point of the big bang.

  • The big band simply didn't explode the universe out as we see it. We only describe it as a bang because it happened and from nothing there was something (which can be true regardless of how much it hurts your head to think about). 13,720,000,000years is the age of the universe, all things we see today formed over that time only with the reactions and laws to do so. If you want to say that god put the big bang into motion, fine, just another gap we have to fill with knowledge.

  • @fenstemakeram08 What you fail to understand regardless of how much you write is, just because you asert something as true, does not make it true. Mmmkay ? There are several 1600yo texts like the bible, and several that are older, so your basis that the bible tells me so is completely irrelevant because it's not the only document that explains such revelations. Just because you want to pick one fairy tale and stick to it, doesn't mean we have to.

  • The universe didn't expand with universe popping out of it like a fucking jack in the box. The properties to create such cosmic structure were a property of the big bang, and it wasn't a fast experience. We know the universe is 13,720,000,000 years old, try to even fathom that amount of time. It should make you feel small and insignificant. But, that's fine, you can go on thinking you are a child of christ, and this universe is completely for you. Rather, i'd like to see wrestle a bear.

  • Great video, it is funny how the "critics" of the video do not even try to refute the arguments in this video.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more