Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Truthsurge debates Anglicanapologist72 part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
96 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2009

A Saturday debate between Truthsurge and Anglicanapologist72, on the historicity of Jesus.

*Sorry about the quality, of the audio and video. Some parts of the debate were lost by quick capture.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Again, TS makes my point early in the video by stating that hearsay is not reliable. I contend that all scripture is hearsay, or simply, stories. They cannot be any more than that unless you can show these bible statements to be factual. Now some things are, such as geographical locations, or even some events, where others are not. An example of this is the Exodus. But the area I'm concerned with is any supernatural claim. None can be validated. There's no evidence for any of them.

  • @hellavadeal "if not a miraculous vision, then what?" = argument from ignorance, fail

  • Truth surge is out of his league here. When Paul said that these people saw it , those people were still alive and others at that time could ask them. Something changed Paul from a hater of Christians to one of the greatest teachers of Christianity. If not a miraculous vision , what? Certainly not to be popular in a time of persecution of Christians. He gave up everything for his beliefs.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more