Jacques Derrida. The Notion of Stupidity. 2004
Top Comments
All Comments (17)
-
all questions are "dangerous", and danger is our business.
-
@avoidingstudy Such an injunction is non-sensical.
-
@killpolitics not really the same (eg Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, Nancy...) but certainly incontournable
-
@BehaviorModification ur such a phony rofl "apropos"? come off it. jew.
-
@killpolitics definitely check again. there's a ton of them you would probably find really interesting, far more interesting than Sartre i might add
-
@killpolitics dont forget baudrillard
-
@killpolitics haha right. And I suppose people like Cixous and Foucault don't make it on your list.
-
@IvyLeagueJunkie : I simply have a question apropos a statement made in your comment. & I could very well be reading between the lines or making false assumptions so correct me if this is indeed the case. & if so I do apologize in advance. So help me here if u wish—how can there be "no right way but there" [still be] "dangerous questions to ask?" I agree that there can only be one 'Truth' or no truth. But w/o truth, does not danger itself become rather relativistic? What defines danger? Shalom!
-
This is better--I'm still not a fan of Derrida overall, but I'm a willing bystander of his theory of stupidity. He is far better in person than translation--not that this is a useful addition, even if it was a leap of faith for me personally. Respecting Derrida is a difficult endeavor if your introduction came via Richard Rorty--respecting both philosophers is a struggle, albeit one I am very grateful to have stumbled across. There is no right way-but there are dangerous questions to ask. Always
-
very interessant
You haven't done much reading have you?
tookfounie 3 years ago 7
I'm watching this video with my spirit monkey called noumenon. Later renamed Johnson for short. He is wearing a T-shirt declaring - 'I'm with stupid -->'
sicknessuntodeath 4 years ago 7