Al Gore lies about ClimateGate on CNN and MSNBC - "the most recent one(email) is like 10 years ago"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,787
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 9, 2009

Climategate: Gore falsifies the record.


Al Gore has studied the Climategate emails with his typically rigorous eye and dismissed them as mere piffle:

Q: How damaging to your argument was the disclosure of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University?

A: To paraphrase Shakespeare, its sound and fury signifying nothing. I havent read all the e-mails, but the most recent one is more than 10 years old. These private exchanges between these scientists do not in any way cause any question about the scientific consensus.

And in case you think that was a mere slip of the tongue:


Q: There is a sense in these e-mails, though, that data was hidden and hoarded, which is the opposite of the case you make [in your book] about having an open and fair debate.

A: I think its been taken wildly out of context. The discussion youre referring to was about two papers that two of these scientists felt shouldnt be accepted as part of the IPCC report. Both of them, in fact, were included, referenced, and discussed. So an e-mail exchange more than 10 years ago including somebodys opinion that a particular study isnt any good is one thing, but the fact that the study ended up being included and discussed anyway is a more powerful comment on what the result of the scientific process really is.

In fact, thrice denied:

These people are examining what they can or should do to deal with the P.R. dimensions of this, but where the scientific consensus is concerned, its completely unchanged. What were seeing is a set of changes worldwide that just make this discussion over 10-year-old e-mails kind of silly.

In fact, as Watts Up With That shows, one Climategate email was from just two months ago. The most recent was sent on November 12 - just a month ago. The emails which have Tom Wigley seeming (to me) to choke on the deceit are all from this year. Phil Jones infamous email urging other Climategate scientists to delete emails is from last year.

How closely did Gore read these emails? Did he actually read any at all? Was he lying or just terribly mistaken? What else has he got wrong?

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Why do we have to keep hearing from this fat, bloated, lying turd?

  • Al Gore = Idiot.

see all

All Comments (127)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MingkMT

    LIES.

    Survey of Climate Scientists by Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch 2010. "Most climate scientists disagree with positions that are at the foundation of the alarmist case. This survey shows NO CONSENSUS on the science behind the global warming scare.

    When asked questions scientists seem quick to admit their uncertainty. MAJORITIES of CLIMATE SCIENTISTS say they DO NOT BELIEVE the scientific claims that underlie the theory and predictions of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change"

  • Sea levels rising? No, falling. Globe warming? No, cooling. Are any IPCC models/projections correct? No. Reduction of rain forests due to AGW? Not happening. Polar bears disappearing? No, Populations are increasing rapidly. Greenland and Antarctica ice is melting? Nope, net ice mass is increasing; so are ice flows. Hurricanes increasing? No, they are at an all-time low. And so on it goes.

    If you list every dire prediction made by alarmists, you will find that they have been right ZERO times.

  • @MingkMT - I was considering responding, but then I saw your post calling someone "fucking retarded". ...never mind.

  • From: Phil Jones

    To: “Michael E. Mann”

    Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

    Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004

    “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !

    Cheers

    Phil”

  • @MingkMT That's why he is being sued by 30,000 scientists with another million waiting in the aisle? Get serious. You are the joker.

  • @CaptainMacNasty

    Climate change is different from global warming...

    99% of all species to have lived on this planet are now extinct, and not all species going extinct is caused by humans. Don't mean to be rude, but no need to throw in random bullshit into the mix.

  • @JTM7155

    Because he gets a percent of americas tax revenue for being an ex-vice president... right...

    How bout you think before you just spurt shit out? lol jesus

  • Hey idiots, wonder why people were trying to make it look bad? Because they think the world is ending and they are trying to save it, jesus christ.

    I hope you all know by now these emails lead to nothing after EIGHT committees (mostly paid for by companies who deny global warming) found no evidence of fraud or scientific miss conduct.

    As I am not a climatologist and have no training in the matter, I can not say with if global warming is true. But I do know you people are fucking retarded.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more