Scientific Fraud (EP-2) - Neanderthal Man

Science is Knowledge as defined in Webster's dictionary.
Life from Space, Archeopteryx, Java Man, Neanderthal Man, Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Peking Man, East Africa Man, The "Gap Theory" & Theistic Evolution.
missing link
Scientific Fraud Charles Darwin, Charles Dawson, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
"THE DESCENT OF MAN" page 141 Charles Darwin plainly says that he believed man to be descendant of "monkeys".
quote:
"The Simiadae then branched off into two great stems, the New World and Old World monkeys; and from the latter, at a remote period, Man, the wonder and glory of the Universe, proceeded."
Darwin was NOT saying we descended from a *common ancestor" but from monkeys! These are defenses commonly used to defend Darwin from embarrassment...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• missing link
• evolution
• Archeopteryx
• Java Man
• Neanderthal Man
• Piltdown Man
• Nebraska Man
• Peking Man
• East Africa Man
• Charles Dawson
• Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
• life
• from
• space
• Theistic Evolution
• ufo
• alien
• false
• fraud
• lie
• philosophy
• science
• gap theory

[abukamoon]

Maybe Charles Darwin descended from a monkey, but I didn't.

[vudumojo]

@abukamoon :)

[jeffmoppi]

Thanks for reminding us of George Gordon once again!

[labrat1807]

@wildcats8530 You do know that Mr Hovind is now in prison don't you? He was wrong about everything, absolutely everything he said. The one exception is that he's right about why the word dinosaur doesn't appear in the KJV Bible. How his reasoning then gets to 'and so dinosaurs and man coexisted' is beyond a joke. NO HUMAN FOSSILS IN THE SAME STRATA AS DINOSAUR FOSSILS. Get over it.

[vudumojo]

@Mii20230201 That picture indicates a "common ancestor". I already proved to you that the *theory* of evolution really IS based on one species becoming another species, from Darwin himself, not a "common ancesteor" but you ignored that.

Darwin was a joke HA HA HA LOL

[vudumojo]

@Mii20230201 I already proved to you that the *theory* of evolution really IS based on one species becoming another species, from Darwin himself, but you ignored that.

[vudumojo]

@Mii20230201 Evolution is your religion. It is not backed by any scientific proof but only your faith.

[vudumojo]

@Mii20230201 Teacher told us lies.

"THE DESCENT OF MAN" page 141 Charles Darwin plainly says that he believed man to be descendant of "monkeys".

quote:

"The Simiadae then branched off into two great stems, the New World and Old World monkeys; and from the latter, at a remote period, Man, the wonder and glory of the Universe, proceeded."

Darwin was NOT saying we descended from a *common ancestor" but from monkeys! These are defenses commonly used to defend Darwin from embarrassment...

[vudumojo]

@zen699 I'm telling you one species has never evolved into another species or interbred with another species.

No matter how many times a dog has sex with a skunk it can never impregnate the skunk.

It has never happened and never. Likewise an ape-man, a totally different "species" from MAN has never reproduced with man either.

Neanderthal was A MAN, nothing more, nothing less.

Just another race, like a black man, or red man or white man etc...

No Big Deal!

[vudumojo]

@MoiselSpecky Thanks! I am happy you enjoyed it.

God bless :)