Free Energy Elemental Rod Generator 1

Google Videos.
Dr. James B. Schwartz.
This video defies logic, is it a hoax, or is there a way to tap ambient energy, you decide.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Elemental_Rod_Generator

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ambient
• neutrino
• electron
• oil
• alternative
• science
• nikola
• tesla
• henry
• moray
• floyd
• sweet
• free
• energy
• ufo
• technology
• pure
• systems
• unexplained

[Kevinite]

The question is: Which 73 and 74 elements? Have any of you looked up electropotential of elements? Does anyone think the spacing of the two rods is critical? The length? The diameter? How were the rods formed? Baked into that shape? Glued? Naturally shaped? Carved? Are the rods connected where they attach to the board? Is there an inside and an outside to the rods (like a battery)? Imagine that the info he gives you is misinformation. How would YOU approach the construction of this device?

[crippled82]

_consisting of_ 73 and 74 different elements, but you could be right.

[Rick007191]

Great...This works!

If you want to know more about the free energy generator..

Do a Google search for "Top Magnet Generator Free Energy" ...

Choose the First Result (Skip the Advertisements)

[Rocism01]

Element - 73 = Tantalum

Element - 74 = Tungsten

reference to the periodic table...

hope that helps the ones that actually want to do Real Experimentation.

One day we'll be Free... it is in Our Hands Now...

[kadeschui]

i can't wait til utube figurs this out so i can rechrge my ipod tuch

[guineapiggyman]

WHAT DOES THERE POSITION ON THE ROD HAVE TO DO WITH IT NOT BEING A B ATTERY?!

[vartatoosh]

Could you please give us some discount and let us use 72 and 73 elements

instead of 73 and 74?

[ActiveStorage]

@Kevinite yes, but personally asking all these questions about a particular specific device recembles reverse engeneering or "top-down" aproach to development. I think ppl should be using "bottom-up" aproach when trying to invent something new. By "bottom-up" i mean questioning and re-developing the core fundamental establishments in science and scientific knowledge. Clearly humans dont know shit about anything anyway

[Kevinite]

@ActiveStorage - Food for thought certainly! Could there be some radioactive properties involved? Is it a receiver? Does it have to be charged up like a battery? Is the distance between the rods critical? Is the rod length critical? The diameter? How would you make one of these?

[ActiveStorage]

@Kevinite doesnt that mean he simply made a battery by combining all these different materials? The only difference is his battery might not be using acids or does it? His arguement "its not a battery cause anywhere you move it the light works" is retarded and doesnt make any sense.

In any case noone knows how long his device can actually power that light bulb. I wish the operator would make a time-lapsed video with some clocks or better open sky vissible in the frame to clear it out a bit