Glock 19 w/ 33rd. Mag

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
195,937
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 31, 2007

My buddy shooting my Glock 19 with a 33 round mag in it. Can you say "high capacity"?

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • George Lucas called, he wants his HD camera back :P

  • Notice! There is a moron called ''TheGunsDoKillPeople'' spreading BS on channels. Do NOT open any URLs on her channels. They contain links to gay porn sites that try to execute malicious code as soon as the URLs are open. The FBI is already looking into the matter according to my IC3 contacts

see all

All Comments (117)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 31

    

  • @Zealix guess again. Search "Guns Save Lives" on google. The FBI estimates up to 2 MILLION lawful uses of firearms by innocents in self defense every year. There have been multiple school shootings stopped early by armed citizens.

    Do a bare minimum of fucking research before you spout your uninformed opinions. There is no movement less based on facts than the anti gun movement, except maybe Scientology.

  • @SurprisinglyClever Limiting guns no matter what type is better for the safety of the general public and you know it. No civilian with his gun is going to stop criminals anyway, the police does.

  • @rjohnston96 And no, handguns aren't only for hurting people. Millions use them solely for hunting, recreation, and target shooting. But you know what? So WHAT if they're for hurting people? You want to ban them? How well did that work for drugs? For alcohol? Manufacturing guns is no harder. A few CNC machines and computers and you have guns. Hell, the French underground home built pistols during the WW2 resistance. You can't control them, because criminals don't obey your laws. Deal with it.

  • @rjohnston96 you may want to educate yourself about the community you attack before you claim no one hunts with handguns. It's actually quite popular.

    Oh, as for licensing? I own high-capacity handguns, an AR-15, and a short-barrel shotgun. Guess what? No license. Because I live in a free state that values the Constitution of the United States. Guess what else? My state is ranked 48 out of 50 for violent crime. Hey, remind me, how well is California ranked for violent crime?

  • @rjohnston96 Of course not. Because those are Constitutionally protected rights. Why should the Second Amendment be an exception? And lest you say "because guns hurt people", might I remind you that Hitler's WORDS motivated a national to the largest mass genocide in the history of human warfare. Why not prove that you NEED to exercise your free speech?

    Also, yes, many people hunt with Glocks. Search around about the Glock Model 20 in 10mm. A very popular hunting handgun.

  • @rjohnston96 Why would every single military special forces unit issue high capacity weapons? Is it because they're bad shots? No, of course not. More rounds is more chances, and more time in the fight. It's a nonsense argument to say that 10-round magazines aren't "necessary". The Second Amendment, and the Bill of Rights in general, is not now and has NEVER been about necessity. Do you have to prove a NEED to practice your religion? A NEED not to quarter soldiers? A NEED for due process?

  • @rjohnston96 I never even realized you bothered to return comment, and frankly, you needn't have bothered. Your argument fails immensely on every logical level

    First, your proficiency argument. You argue that "if you need more than ten rounds, you should not be handling a gun anyway." About half of your two replies are centered around critiquing my shooting skills. Setting aside the fact that I am a very accomplished shooter, shooting since I was five, I'll simply ask

  • @ArcanineTheFurry

    LOL, FBI Contacts. Says the guy who's a furry.

  • @SurprisinglyClever and no none of that shit makes any sense, the laughner case only made me realize we don't need extended mags on pistols, what are you going to hunt with a glock? you gonna use it for home defense? you don't need that many rounds. pistols are all around just for hurting people anyway. there's no logical argument for them except for that you are a shitty shooter, and should not have a gun or that you are a competition shooter, which if you are you should have a license got that

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more