Doc Paul: Reagan's deficit spending/ Unemployment? Poverty? Unbridled Greed...

http://www.thesoapboxroadshow.com
Ronald Magnus Reagan cut taxes - and supply-side economics failed... where were you then. Ron?

Anti union are we??? how about corrupt, greedy, incompetent, VASTLY OVER-PAID Management? What say you....

http://www.truthandreconciliationus.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ron
• Paul
• Fed
• unemployment
• recession
• bailout
• Paulson
• Bernanke
• interest
• rate
• money
• supply
• ronald
• reagan

[jlbarber54]

@Ralphdraw3 All of your examples follow the Keynesian economic school of thought. Ron Paul follows the Austrian school of economics. If one does have a comprehensive knowledge of both, one cannot know the difference.

Ron Paul argues against both parties when it comes to economics. You put him in Reagan’s camp but you are wrong.

[Estate17]

ahhhh ahhhhh? Do you really care ron? lol. The way the government is acting now, the Unemployment rate is going to go up. Ronald Regan talked the talked but didn't walk the walk. Under Regan the government doubled in size. I think the major difference between Regan Economics and "free markets" is the idea that you need to allow everyone to retain the money that they earned. Upper, Middle, and Lower class alike. Regan really only gave the break to the upper class.

[METALMAN4Wii]

What do you think of our New Asshole Governor Synder.....?

[Luvanicebum]

This is a lull before the next crash and the Greatest Depression the world has ever seen.

Look at a chart of the great depression 1935 through 43.

There was a temporary ramp up in the stock market in 1937 after the "New Deal" spending that Hoover started at the end of his term and Roosevelt continued. They are the exact same scenario.

The problem with your criticism is that both parties overspend for different reasons.

[bodydelightsnj]

I like to hear both sides but guess what, you are so wrong on this. You make no sense whatsoever. Taxes need to be cut not because the "rich will work harder and 14 hour shifts" like you stated, cause you know that won't happen but based on the fact that people will have more of their own $ to spend and save. ralph there is more to this and if there is a way you and I can have a civil conversation - let me know cause I'd love to! :)

[TheStoicAgnostic]

I wasn't going to watch this but I saw all the thumbs down

So I was able to confirm you do know what you're talking about

thumbs up

[Ralphdraw3]

Hush up and fix your crumby, corrupt, lying, interventionist, deficit-spending party...

[chewbaca1989]

I refuse to hush up. It's my duty and my right. And the Dems are good?

Come on.

[Ralphdraw3]

Bush43 failure

Bush41 failure

Reagan failure

Nixon failure

Ron Paul's Republican party sucks - stop with cute game-playing arguments..

[chewbaca1989]

And you don't? You Baby Boomers dropped the ball.

I have hope in the young folks, they're always revolutionary types.

Inflation, whoopee!

(food riots, tax rebellion, get your guns!)