Ron Paul Vs Mark Halperin

Ron Paul, coming off a strong second place finish in the New Hampshire 2012 Republican Presidential primary, had an interesting interaction with Mark Halperin on MSNBC's Morning Joe. The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.

http://www.businessinsider.com/ron-paul-morning-joe-2012-1

Does the mainstream media hate Ron Paul? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os85fo3kk0Q


Subscribe to The Young Turks: http://bit.ly/eWuu5i

Find out how to watch The Young Turks on Current by clicking here: http://www.current.com/gettyt

The Largest Online New Show in the World.

Google+: http://www.gplus.to/TheYoungTurks

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tytnation

Twitter: http://twitter.com/theyoungturks

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ron paul mark halperin
• ron paul morning joe
• ron paul new hampshire
• mitt romney new hampshire
• ron paul mitt romney
• ron paul head start
• ron paul fed
• ron paul federal reserve
• ron paul constitution
• ron paul unconstitutional
• ron paul dana bash
• ron paul media
• romney new hampshire
• ron paul south carolina
• ron paul president
• ron paul polls
• morning joe
• ron paul primary
• young turks' cenk uygur

[ProlRevo]

Cenk is wrong on this one, as he has been on many issues lately. Fighting media bias belongs at the center of Ron Paul's campaign. Media bias is one of the main things that has got us where we are. CNN, etc., have long supported everything that Ron Pual is opposing, including the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. BTW, I don't think I speak as a "Paulbot," being Canadian.

[inademv]

@therrydicule I was assuming that you were a Ron Paul supporter given the way in which you responded to my previous comment. If this is not the case then disregard this response. If it is the case that you are a supporter of his, how does his constitution thumping mesh with his deliberate decision to not seek to rectify something he claims is unconstitutional.

[therrydicule]

@inademv "it should however bother you who don't believe he is." -> wait, are we speaking about a politician? Playing the constutionalist card is just playing "who get the biggest dick" without showing it, it's meaningless and everyone doing probably have the equivalent of "a small one." That's how I see it, so I'm suppose to believe what?

[inademv]

@therrydicule No, because his stance is strictly a "constitutional purist" one and the cornerstone of EVERY argument he makes is that everything should be constitutional. So if he is identifying something that is in opposition to it, not working at once to rectify that situation is a dereliction of your principle.

That fact doesn't bother me because I already know that Paul is just a huckster, it should however bother you who don't believe he is.

[therrydicule]

@inademv Well, if something is unconstiutional but none prioritize - you know, something nobody really give a damn about... Would you attack that first, or say "look, we got priorities, this is not one"?

[wiz9496]

Ron Paul sucks! He can't even give a straight answer. What a failure.

[MyDadsRubberBroke]

@Zaxomio cuz he's DANGEROUS!!!

[Zaxomio]

i thought he was out of the race because he dident get enough votes. Just thought he was out cuz i wasent hearing about him anymore

[inademv]

@cookiesnmilk1 So if it's unconstitutional but he isn't going to fix it then how can you expect him to fix any of the other unconstitutional things he said he would fix?