What if we had a different president in '93?

Missus clinton's latest ad, 'President,' is an (inadvertent) ode to the dangerous smallness of clinton. This video is my response.

NANO-PRESIDENT:
The Danger of the Unrelenting Smallness of bill + hillary clinton

by Mia T, 7.31.05

Our leaders are inexorably shrinking. According to current mathematical models, they are shrinking at a rate of 6.7 per linear dimension per election cycle per terrorist attack. At this rate, most leaders will be nanoleaders by the 2020s.

The leader-shrinkage function is discontinuous for t=1992-2000 and continuous for all other t.

The 1990s saw in America a sudden, discontinuous drop in leader size, a drop that retrospectively, post-9/11, has been theorized to be its greatest lower bound. (Can anything be lower than a clinton?)

"Two for the price of one," the clinton pitch in '92 -- (Did the clintons understand at the time that one was not enough?) -- only made matters worse. Missus clinton in the West Wing actually added to this discontinuous decrease in leader size.

History will record, therefore, that the clintons--the twofer, (1992-2000), were America's first nano-president.

The clintons continue to imperil virtually every sector of society, indeed, continue to imperil America and the world, with their exponentially increasing facility in manipulating electoral/policy matter and energy at ever smaller scales. Their "school uniforms" of the '90s became "nanotech uniforms" today; both are proxies for "fight terrorism," which the clintons have neither the stomach nor the know-how to do.

The twofer construct, transposed to circumvent the 22nd Amendment, is now poised to retake power. A self-replicating, Constitution-specific pathogen, the clinton nano-presidency, post-9/11, is a danger that we cannot-we must not-abide.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• hillary
• bill
• clinton
• nano-president
• what-if
• 911
• proximate
• cause
• the
• terrorism
• stupid

[JohnMichaels20]

he wasn't in office in 1992 you fucking moron, and also, no jumbo jets hit buildings during his presidency

[miat1111]

1/2 'moron'

I was using '92 loosely, obviously. He was elected in '92.

Put on your thinking cap. It is a distinction without a difference: The first terrorist attack-(BY THE SAME PEOPLE!-ON THE SAME BUILDING!)-occurred in '93. They blew a yawning, 60-ft crater in the WTC and the clintons did zip.

clinton was 15 min away mere days after the attack, and the idiot refused even to visit the site. He told America to ignore the bombing, ignore the 1st attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor.

[miat1111]

2/2 'moron'

The terrorists continued to declare war on America and commit acts of war on America thruout the clintons' tenure and the clintons continued to do nothing.

Now you want to put these 2 back in the Oval Office? And you call ME a moron?

[miat1111]

P.S.

The clintons were too stupid to understand, or too self-serving to acknowledge, that a terrorist war requires only one consenting player: When a terrorist declares war on you and commits acts of war against you, you are perforce at war.

You have 2 options: Fight or surrender. For 8 years, the clintons surrendered, allowing an incipient, still-stoppable al Qaeda and its threat to grow exponentially.

[miat1111]

"clinton was 15 min away mere days after the attack, and the idiot refused even to visit the site."-me

Perhaps clinton reasoned that if he were to visit the site, he just might have to retaliate for what was an obvious act of war.

[miat1111]

We would see this m.o. many, many times during the clinton years-with regard to terrorism, of course, but also with regard to Rwanda: clinton ordered his administration never to use the word "genocide," although it became clear within days that the Rwandan mass slaughter of what would ultimately be 800,000 blacks was precisely that.

A High-Tech Lynching: Genocide + the clintons - pt2

hillary clinton: LYNCHIN'

(BOTH YouTube)

[admspooner]

Rep. were very vocal and forceful in not allowing Clinton to go after Bin Laden. Remember the Republicans of old who wanted to stay on American soil, not being heroes of the world. This is what clinton was blamed for, sticking his nose in afghanistan.

After the SSCoal bombing he tried again, still republicans said no.

Bush dropped more bombs in operation shock and Awe than WWII. IN THE WRONG COUNTRY. FOR OIL. and let Bin Laden go. Al Qaeda isn't in Iraq still. get the occupation out

[mredstriumph]

Trying to pass the buck backward? The hijackers were already in the country and training for the attack YEARS before Bush took office. Meanwhile, there were TWO embassy attacks in Africa killing hundreds of marines, attacks on the USS Cole, and numerous attacks on American military and civilians all over the globe by Bin Laden and fundamentalist Islam.

The 911 attacks were in the works WELL before Bush took office as evidence by the hijackers themselves&any honest person can see that's true.

[Keszler]

What if we had a different president in 2000? Fucking conservatives

[girzwald3]

Acctually, it is very believable and true. Clinton had over a dozen times to take bin laden out. But he was too busy getting hummers to think about anything else.

[ariestheramone]

there is absolutely NO BELIEVABLE REASON to blame Clinton for 9/11!!!

trying to pass the buck backward, doesn't work.

[pbrown4833]

This guy wasn't on the radar screen in 1992. He's been on and off Bush's during the last 8. Come on. Blame Clinton? Does real history not suit you needs?

[ForSale113]

Everyone just wants to play the blame game on 9/11. The truth is Clinton and Bush BOTH share some blame for 9/11. It's what we know in our hearts to be true.

[ConservativeUSA]

The democrats only want to appease, as Churchill said; "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last".

[betoblue10]

bush is the most stupid president in the history , and he makes money with the war, who are the stupids bush won twiece and is gonna leave ue in an economical problem, but he his father and his family getting money, bush plan the sep 11 and protect bin ladens family

[betoblue10]

you americans deserve that, you love war, you love to kill children all arround the word just to make bussines, bush is making money with the war, you supose to have schools you supose to be the first world and you vote for bush twice, you are the idiots, you love killing people arround the word