I have seen some scams before but this one left me scratching my head. How does one go from 20 mpg to 40 mpg highway? How can it only cost the gentlemen $150?
Decide for yourself here are the instructions if you care to take a look: www.alt4gas.com
@tampicokeed well PMA's dont require electricty to electromagnetize the core to produce electricity in the first place. So in the end run, theyre effeciency at generating it is much higher. Giving ALL of us more useable power to work whith while the engine is running. I'm not running them in in a vehicle. There a law in Canada, States you cant put any homemade Hydrogen generator, or run hydrogen in any moving vehicle.
so its on an 5hp moter in the shed. bout 7 oz. water a week.
@randacnam7321 But sir, u dont understand.lol In ol Me102288s fantacy land, if u add an extra load 2 an alternator, it does not require any extra gasoline to handle that increased load!!!!!!!!?!!!! Oh how wonderful a world it could be if only people like u or me were that "intelligent"!!!!!.
@Me102288 U r running these PMAs but what r they DOING 4 u???? For at least a yr now u have been preaching about ur PMAs andHHO. By now if everything u claim 2 b true is true u should b running a car using only water. Why r u not??? U do not do anything with these ideas u hav, and u cannot comprehend basic physical principles---what a combination!! If th childishly simple things u assert were tru, no oil wells or dams would ever hav ben built
@6tortured6soul6 interesting, you follow the same principle.. this is exactly why gears were invented. Too obtain more force with less input
that makes HHO on demand absolut;ley posible. Make less work for the engine to create energy :-)
beat you to it though.. I'm running 2 Permanent magnet alternators, they put out more power for less horsepower then standard electromagnet alternators.. talk about effeciecy boost.. woot over 40% more for less from the engine :-)
@Me102288 These devices claim to break down water into hydrogen and oxygen, which is then burned as fuel in the engine. Some energy is then taken from the engine to run the electrolyzer that breaks the water down into hydrogen and oxygen. This process is claimed to increase the power output of the engine. THAT is the scam, as the above process has a net energy loss.
@randacnam7321 cumbustion engines effeciebcy is by which fuel they run. there is no base if there's no fuel running it. all fossil fuels are under 50% with propane and natural gas being the most effecient.. Hydrogen is closer to 75% with the potential of even more giving how we learn new things everyday
If it isnt today, its the next.. Nasa use's it explicity called it a fuel..
FUEL..... wonder why they'd call it that it its a big scam
@Me102288 If u think its so posible 2 "spin a pma while taking a small bit off 2 keep th proces runnng" than u should very easily b able 2 demonstrate it. How long have you been harping on these overunity ideas, but never simply demonstratng that they work? I understand u hav an electrc car. Why dont u attach 1 or more PMA to charg th batteries and nevr plug in agin!!!? Same thing with ICE using HHO! WHAT R U WAITNG FOR! Now why dont u try 2 addres this comment instead of anothr funny tangent??
@tampicokeed course not, no engine on any fuel can put out more kinetic energy then its maximum output..
spinning a pma while taking a smal bit of to keep the process running pus a 45 watt light bulbs worth of free, battery charging power hehe, thinking of a small 4 cylinder for the next test, possibly wrig more then one pma and gear it down. Putting any more then a 320 watt load stalls this little crapper right out,
@tampicokeed well PMA's dont require electricty to electromagnetize the core to produce electricity in the first place. So in the end run, theyre effeciency at generating it is much higher. Giving ALL of us more useable power to work whith while the engine is running. I'm not running them in in a vehicle. There a law in Canada, States you cant put any homemade Hydrogen generator, or run hydrogen in any moving vehicle.
so its on an 5hp moter in the shed. bout 7 oz. water a week.
Me102288 1 month ago
@randacnam7321 But sir, u dont understand.lol In ol Me102288s fantacy land, if u add an extra load 2 an alternator, it does not require any extra gasoline to handle that increased load!!!!!!!!?!!!! Oh how wonderful a world it could be if only people like u or me were that "intelligent"!!!!!.
tampicokeed 1 month ago
@Me102288 U r running these PMAs but what r they DOING 4 u???? For at least a yr now u have been preaching about ur PMAs andHHO. By now if everything u claim 2 b true is true u should b running a car using only water. Why r u not??? U do not do anything with these ideas u hav, and u cannot comprehend basic physical principles---what a combination!! If th childishly simple things u assert were tru, no oil wells or dams would ever hav ben built
tampicokeed 1 month ago
@6tortured6soul6 interesting, you follow the same principle.. this is exactly why gears were invented. Too obtain more force with less input
that makes HHO on demand absolut;ley posible. Make less work for the engine to create energy :-)
beat you to it though.. I'm running 2 Permanent magnet alternators, they put out more power for less horsepower then standard electromagnet alternators.. talk about effeciecy boost.. woot over 40% more for less from the engine :-)
Me102288 1 month ago
@Me102288 These devices claim to break down water into hydrogen and oxygen, which is then burned as fuel in the engine. Some energy is then taken from the engine to run the electrolyzer that breaks the water down into hydrogen and oxygen. This process is claimed to increase the power output of the engine. THAT is the scam, as the above process has a net energy loss.
randacnam7321 1 month ago 2
@randacnam7321 cumbustion engines effeciebcy is by which fuel they run. there is no base if there's no fuel running it. all fossil fuels are under 50% with propane and natural gas being the most effecient.. Hydrogen is closer to 75% with the potential of even more giving how we learn new things everyday
If it isnt today, its the next.. Nasa use's it explicity called it a fuel..
FUEL..... wonder why they'd call it that it its a big scam
electrolysis isnt a scam
Me102288 1 month ago
@Me102288 If u think its so posible 2 "spin a pma while taking a small bit off 2 keep th proces runnng" than u should very easily b able 2 demonstrate it. How long have you been harping on these overunity ideas, but never simply demonstratng that they work? I understand u hav an electrc car. Why dont u attach 1 or more PMA to charg th batteries and nevr plug in agin!!!? Same thing with ICE using HHO! WHAT R U WAITNG FOR! Now why dont u try 2 addres this comment instead of anothr funny tangent??
tampicokeed 1 month ago
If you bash it, try it. It works. Ive done it.
QuincySweet2 1 month ago
I did this with my 91 Corolla and went from 34mpg to 43mpg.
QuincySweet2 1 month ago
@tampicokeed course not, no engine on any fuel can put out more kinetic energy then its maximum output..
spinning a pma while taking a smal bit of to keep the process running pus a 45 watt light bulbs worth of free, battery charging power hehe, thinking of a small 4 cylinder for the next test, possibly wrig more then one pma and gear it down. Putting any more then a 320 watt load stalls this little crapper right out,
so if tiny works, it should scale up well
Me102288 1 month ago