The purpose of this test was to show I can produce HHO at a rate and Eff of 5.05 MMW (11.89 Watts/ml and at a rate of 2.94 ml/sec). The cell is constructed of 304 SS and the plates are 2"X 5" spaced .oo5" apart. There are 4 plates +NN- configuration. the cell is run with a PWM module 106 HZ. supplied with a 12 VDC car battery 300 CCA. The electrolyte is 3tsp lye NaOH in 1.5 liters RO water.
Watts are used with mmw because watts = amps * volts. Watts are a measure of the energy you are using. MMW gives you the amount you are producing in one minute per watt. So 5.5 MMW means 5 ml of HHO per minute per watt. So one watt produces 5.5 ml HHO and if you had 100 watts, you would get 550 ml HHO per minute. I don't really understand why you find it so inconvenient I guess.
markmil2002 3 years ago
If one electro-plates SS with Platinum, efficiency would be much greater. Just thinking out loud :-)
The777truth 3 years ago
The plates are very thick .1046 12 Ga Stainless for rigidity there is two layers of United States postal service packing tape between them on each end. I measured the thickness after applying the tape. It was .1051 with two layers.
I had trouble with only one layer with the plates shorting out. Also you cannot tighten the screws holding them together extremely tight. Only finger tight. I also have a 50 Amp fuse in-line with the pwm module so if I have a problem. I won't have a fire.
AllgoodAutomation 3 years ago
also are you sure you have .005 spacing between plates? from video it appears more like 1/16" (.0625)?
risingsunHHO 3 years ago
according to the calculation formula I came across you have achieved 65.7% eff. nice
risingsunHHO 3 years ago
nice ... and with such a simple setup ... I gotta try one myself ...
SmartScarecrow 3 years ago
Thank you AGA. Great numbers.
Did you check the accuracy of the cen-tech meters? I returned 3 of them because they were way off. Even trying to adjust with the pot inside didn't get them close to the right reading. Just a FYI.
CarbideTip 3 years ago