Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Putnam/Rorty Debate

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
8,605
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 19, 2007

Film about the Putnam and Rorty Debate and the revival of pragmatism.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Excellent video, nice to see the juxtaposition between these two great thinkers. Margolis was a delight to hear as well, I liked his comment that Rorty and Putnam were right about each other but wrong about themselves...

  • Thanks for posting this.

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Joseph Margolis reminds me of my calculus prof, Walter Eugene Couch :P

  • You can see the whole thing at vimeo.com channels americanphilosopher

  • Crappy video. Very little footage of Rorty and Putnam explaining their views, no depth, just a lot of window dressing. Like the kid says, go watch some porn instead.

  • It is interesting that Rorty talks about contribution by other philosophers as footnotes to Plato, or footnotes of footnotes of ......footnotes to Plato. But Plato was one of the first to put forward ideas which later came to be known as analytical philosophy. Most philosophically inclined scientists tend to be Platonic in their outlook, for reasons of success of analytical philosophy, with full cognition that there is no finality and the quest gives better picture of reality.

  • I have to agree with Rorty. Afterall, ALL human knowledge is based on interpretation. Therefore ALL human knowledge is subjective.

  • lol why am i watching this? im freaking 16. im ganna go watch some porn

  • I think i'm likely be team Rorty then :D

  • Yes.

  • doesn't Pragmatism see "truth" as a function rather than a warrant for belief? This avoids a groundless metaphysics. But should one care if metaphysics is groundless? Metaphysics simply engages human interest, and could point in a certain direction. Thats something positive. Metaphysics as a kind of aesthetisizing of reality. What philosophical work worth its salt has no metaphysical dimension? That's the gravy of philosophy. I lean toward Putnam.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more