Structural Aspects of Building 7's Collapse: Why the NIST Report is Non-explanatory by Tony Szamboti
Loading...
Uploaded by RadicalPragmatist on Apr 11, 2011
The third in A Three-part Presentation "The Case for a New Building 7 Investigation"
Introduction by Dr. William Pepper
investigatebuilding7.org
This presentation will provide an overview of the construction features, enormity, and strength of World Trade Center Building 7. It will help listeners understand why no building with a steel framed superstructure has ever collapsed through itself for any reason other than controlled demolition, and will provide evidence for why the NIST World Trade Center Building 7 Report is not a satisfactory explanation of the collapse.
- 45 likes, 1 dislikes
-
Top Comments
All Comments (20)
-
Hypothetically speaking, If the Fires really caused the towers to fall then all high rise buildings would have to be strengthened under a new building code or pulled down.
That has not happened they haven't even entertained the idea. There would also be legal action against the developer of the towers from the insurer.
If you think the integrity of steel structures is really this week the YT search (Deepwater Horizon explosion)That was an Oil Platform that burnt for well over 15 hrs a real fire.
-
The Passenger of flight 93 exposed 9/11 as that plane was to hit building 7 but thanks to them it did not reach its intended target, They are the hero's of 9/11 along with all the other people who helped that day. This exposes the fact that all building including the pentagon was pre charged. This is why they don't want to show more CTV footage of the Pentagon as it will expose an explosion milliseconds before impact
-
Can we get this guy to analyze the first two collapses in the same manner?
-
Please Please Please watch on YT:
"Republic of Missouri, the Change our Founders believed in" ASAP!
-
NIST's admission of free-fall ( which they had previously said could not happen because it required the building to have 'no structural components below it' ) indicates their belief that the IMPOSSIBLE had occurred - an invisible 'inferno' makes a building free-fall - with no force other than gravity acting on the super structure, for 100 feet - NIST have been paid to lie - and those responsible should be on trial
-
The lying rat Giuliani Knight Of Malta like Bush - knew the towers were coming down when no one else did - peter jennings interview - and he also knew that wtc7 was coming down - and all foreknowledge of its 'colllapse' from fire came from his office
-
The video fram is frozen. I can only see the north view of the building. I only have audio. Hmm??
-
Thanks, Tony for hollowing out the OCT (Official Conspiracy Theory, Prof. Ray Griffin) in the hope that the shell of TWoT (The War on Ter.) our MICC (Mil.Ind. Cong. Complex) has created will "collapse" like 7WTC. NIST lies and obfuscates like W does about what he knew and when unless Cheney holds his hand. Fraud was perpetrated on the U.S. on election day to get a Fraud Pres. Fraud on Sept. 11, '01 was used to get us into Fraud War, a military contractors wet dream & prayer (war w/out end amen).
-
The "proof" is the damage graphic on page 183 of the final report on WTC 7 that I posted. It shows the actual damage. The 10 story gouge, floor 10 to the ground and the 20+ story gash in the video you posted are not there because NIST determined that they did not exist.
- 9:12
Lakeby Jacquisha6,371,455 views
- 29:36
Hardfire TONY SZAMBOTI / RYAN MACKEY / RONALD WIECK / 1st PROGRAMby garypopkin5,093 views
- 1:48
kapla / keva planks buiding collapse (dynamica bullet physics)by MrFlattower101,315 views
- 1:29:15
Failure to Report : A Panel Discussion Among Journalistsby RadicalPragmatist2,668 views
- 1:20
Building Collapseby fmjava1,216,944 views
- 9:59
Why the NIST report on the WTC towers is falseby DK1Ryan2,080 views
- 1:07
9/11 Firemen Worried About Big Egg in WTC Austin J Tobin Plazaby CNN911Fakes39,268 views
- 30:03
9/11 EXPLOSIVE EVIDENCE: Tony Szamboti, M.E. - Mechanical Engineerby corruptedsilence990 views
- 9:18
Debunking 9/11: NIST Building 7by AlienScientist10,492 views
- 7:51
9/11 BOMB when 1st plane hitby CTV91140,604 views
- 2:48
COMPARISON OF WTC COLLAPSE WITH OTHER BUILDINGSby tru2da1god26,535 views
- 28:06
John Kirby : Film maker / Producer of the Remember Building 7 Adby RadicalPragmatist318 views
- 0:29
WTC Building 7 no fires until afternoonby rhawk3011,903 views
- 28:28
Hardfire TONY SZAMBOTI / RYAN MACKEY / RONALD WIECK / 2nd PROGRAMby garypopkin3,334 views
- 6:02
9/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is Lyingby NanoThermite911379,746 views
- 1:36
9/11 jumpersby CNN911Fakes75,438 views
- 9:29
WTC7 in Freefall--No Longer Controversialby clbackus107,405 views
- 1:15
9/11 WTC 7 Pile - 23 Hours Later Debris From Collapse 'Blew Up' Causing Distant Roof Fireby IranContraScumDid9112,005 views
- 14:24
20110324185908 (1).mpgby electron3204,108 views
- 5:32
North Tower Explodingby DavidChandler91174,799 views
Tony Szamboti is a true patriot
Seigu007 10 months ago 18
The NIST report acknowledged 2.25 seconds or 25 meters of free fall acceleration because David Chandler and others called them on it at the public meeting. Dr. Sunder is a Brahmin, a member of the priestly and intellectual caste of India. He will support the official story but will not tell a bald lie. Before Dr. Sunder acknowledged free fall, he explained why it could not happen (without a CD). Since NIST acknowledged free fall, he and NIST have not discussed its implications.
Skeptic121 9 months ago 2