YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Earthquake Protector: Shake Table Crash Testing

vshustov vshustov·11 videos
63
124,379
Like     Dislike 3

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like vshustov's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike vshustov's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add vshustov's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jun 27, 2007

Comparative earthquake engineering experiments with 12-story building models: the right one is resting on a new type of seismic base isolation called "earthquake protectors", the left one is fixed to the base. The fundamental natural period of superstructures equals 1.2s, the isolated period of Earthquake Protector equals 5.0s, the range of earthquake simulation periods is 0.02 - 2.00s. It is obvious: application of Earthquake Protector can raise a building's seismic sustainability dramatically. Visit also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_iso... and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthqua... .

For virtual re-creation of this testing, use EPETO or Earthquake Performance Evaluation Tool Online at http://www.seismicevaluation.org. You may also choose to download the corresponding software called EPET or Earthquake Performance Evaluation Tool from http://www.epet.space3d.biz

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (vshustov)

  • vshustov

    The model put on base isolators was composed of two 6-story ones. As a result, in the middle, we obtained a double thick deck which, by adding some weight, may be considered slightly detrimental. On the other hand, the upper portion of the isolated model was previously exposed to a severe shaking and inherited considerable structural degradation. Therefore, we rectified it by adding non-structural fasteners (not columns!).

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.
  • vshustov

    The model put on base isolators was composed of two 6-story ones. As a result, in the middle, we obtained a double thick deck which, by adding some weight, may be considered slightly detrimental. On the other hand, the upper portion of the isolated model was previously exposed to a severe shaking and inherited considerable structural degradation. Therefore, we rectified it by adding non-structural fasteners (not columns!).

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.
  • vshustov

    ABC

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.
  • vshustov

    Publish your tool so that others can see it on nees.org

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.
  • vshustov

    You are right, LonleyDeath1423. This is one of the basic pillars of base isolation.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.
  • stevehawking

    great!

    notice how the taller building only gets moving when the smaller one collapses on it!

    · 7

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate stevehawking's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate stevehawking's comment.
  • vshustov

    this is the very idea of earthquake protector!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vshustov's comment.
    in reply to stevehawking (Show the comment)

Top Comments

  • tinwax

    use some grey matter if you have any

    · 7

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate tinwax's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate tinwax's comment.
    in reply to ConjaMAN1 (Show the comment)

All Comments (45)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • iulianastefan

    interesting how the base isolated system has an increased mass at half the height (or so it seems) and some columns added to the upper stories...that increase their overall stiffness...that should act as a mass damper or so it seems to me?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate iulianastefan's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate iulianastefan's comment.
  • andreimurariu

    That is one of the reasons for using base isolation. The natural vibration period of the structure is increased, so that it doesn't "resonate" with the earthquake motion. (if you are interested, check out acceleration response spectrum)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate andreimurariu's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate andreimurariu's comment.
    in reply to Lord Cthulhu (Show the comment)
  • Lord Cthulhu

    The only reason the first one fell is because the frequency resonated with it's own. The second one didn't because it was higher, therefor the frequency was altered.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Lord Cthulhu's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Lord Cthulhu's comment.
  • minillagodzilla2004

    wiggly jiggly

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate minillagodzilla2004's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate minillagodzilla2004's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later