1. Private insurance policies have more flaws than public ones.
a) The most important flaw is the flaw of coverage where not all people and all conditions are covered.
2. An anarchist society void of the super brand of social entrepreneurs would be so cruel and vicious that we would daily witness the passing of individuals for example of perfectly curable illnesses.
3. There are areas on our planet that are much more prone to natural disasters. Cruel Anarchy says leave them to suffer, and socialist governemnt grants do not insentivize the settlers to pack up and move to safer areas.
These are just a few of the examples of flaws of government programs and lack of any enterprise driven program in its place (pure anarchy).
What I do suggest is to engage the business community in social betterment without taking from Jack to pay Joe and take from Joe to pay Bill. This will be social justice without any neocheating.
"How can this be done", you ask? Answer is very simple create a currency (Credon = unit of credit) within the constructs of associated barter companies and enable a monetary system with interest-free credit. Then anyone in need of emergency funds will undergo life coaching and career advice and extended the needed credit to get back on the track of productivity. And since the funds will ultimately need to be paid back to the barter clubs, there will be more accountability and responsibility as to where to settle, what to put in your body and what line of business to get into.
If you would like to help with this initiative go to our IndieGoGo fund raising project page at http://www.indiegogo.com/True-Nirvanic-Society ! AND INVEST IN THE FUTURE OF OUR CIVILIZATION.
@SpaceManAus I am not rich and this plan of getting rid of the rich doesn't threaten me, but I am really concerned for intelligent individuals who through extra productivity have earned more than the average wage earner. If we equalize wages regardless of what critical or minuscule tasks are being performed then we will have the problem that the communist nations were and are facing (nobody will want to produce more through intelligent effort). I seriously hope you will reconsider.
planetofelites 2 months ago
@AAnteus As a matter of fact with private ownership of all land, environmental concerns would be looked after much easier. So far governments have allowed the environment to be abused severely and the only way to reverse this is to privatize all land ownership. A private owner of a piece of land will in a free market enterprise system will individually or together with his/her neighbors seek damages that will make it non-feasible for any industries to pollute.
planetofelites 2 months ago
@AAnteus yes very true, i only wished that people did not attach so much negativity to anarchy and that they were educated enough to practice it wisely.
planetofelites 2 months ago
Anarchy is capitalism. But what we have now is not capitalism. We can't even grow hemp, the most useful plant on planet. Oh well.
AAnteus 2 months ago
Hey Bryan. NA MAS TAS TE. I am studying Accountting and only a couple courses away from my BS. I also studied foodandresource economics and sustainability. Anyways, I also agree with your ideas here. I am looing into grad programs to study environmental economics and accounting to attempt to cost effective identify and monetize external costs, especially those with a significant impact on the environment, for organizations to use to increase operational sustainability and mnmze cost to society.
AAnteus 2 months ago
I think what we need to do is to get rid of the rich, and spread the wealth out evenly. We can do this by making a system were instead of getting lager sums of money you get to retire early and if you wish to keep working then you don’t get more money, you get to help someone else to retire early instead. This will keep jobs available for others end will lead to a shorter work day for everyone. I think no person is worth more than anyone else no matter what job they do.
SpaceManAus 2 months ago