Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People (part 4)
Top Comments
All Comments (25)
-
Oded Fehr is an Israeli
-
GreaAat . . ♥
-
@alldamnnamesaretaken Its still a Hollywood film, which means right off the bat any assumption of an attempt to mirror historical events should be discarded. I see it more as a modern loose interpretation of events leading up to the Third Crusade, using modern secular values and morality, so that audiences can more easily understand and sympathize with the characters. If the film was accurate (an impossible task to begin with), than it would be unwatchable and unrelatable to a modern audience.
-
Wich is BS, calling KOH historically accurate is an atrocity to history
-
Check any list of terrorist acts by death toll. 90% will be committed by Muslims, and over a half by Arabs. It is hardly unreasonable to look for Arab trace in mass bombings.
-
Did anyone hear @ 2:46 "...SKULLS AND BONES INITIATION?" I hate America. America is the most racist place to be. Just like the movie "Soul Plane". I'm blk, but I still found it offensive to watch dem portray an Islamic man enters the plane and everyone stopped everything they were doing and stared @ him with fear in their eyes, assuming he was a terrorist. SMDH!
-
Did anyone hear @ 2:46 "...SKULLS AND BONES INITIATION?" I hate America. America is the most racist place to be.
-
@CarolX2 Three Kings is presenting Arabs in a positive light in one of the only ways Americans know how to interact with them: war. That is not racist, it is flipping our stereotypes of them on their head. If we are refused the ability to demonize in even violent conflict, than we are even more likely to view them in a positive way in peaceful situations as well.
-
ok the video keeps stopping halfway, ¬_¬



At 00:38, it is true. After the Oaklahoma City bombing, I remember many assumed Arabs had done it. One guy on the radio called it, an act of war.
But, after it was learned that a Neo-Nazi had done it, then, all the right wing radio buzzing went silent.
afro747 2 years ago 27
@joy2559 Firstly, the Spanish Christians and the Moors have little to nothing to do with the Second Crusade. KoH is definitely historical fiction, in that it glosses over the atrocities committed by the Saracen forces, but it is still easily one of the most historically accurate depictions of the Crusades in film, as it depicts both sides as morally ambiguous, and shows that in general, the Muslims, and specifically Saladin, were far more tolerant than their Christian counterparts.
IneptTroopr 1 year ago 5