Matt Completely Snaps on The Atheist Experience

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
77,297
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 22, 2010

Basically, Hal, the caller, originally said that certain Chinese characters "such as the one for "devil" being composed of "tempter" and "garden") prove the Genesis account. Matt gave him 3 possibilities, and Hal said that "God dun it" was the most likely, and he would assume that until proven otherwise. He then said that scientists do the same thing, which got Matt really pissed. Seriously, if you really want to piss him off, now you know how.

  • likes, 50 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,351)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @swygster It's referred to as radiocarbon dating, or radiometric dating. just fyi.

  • @swygster No experiment can date back billions of years. Dating methods are based on the ambiguous assumptions of scientists. Many scientists cannot even agree. It's all wild speculation.

  • @SoldierOfChrist110 It's based on radiology of rocks and of many, many, many different methods of the radiology of rocks. And they ALL agree on the same conclusion: that the Earth is 4.56-4.6 billion years old. And you want to know what the best part about these studies are? They are completely objective with no bias. They wouldn't work if there were bias. It's as obvious and objective as the knowledge of what will happen if you put gasoline on fire.

  • @oneballuno Are atheists main method of intelligence to call people petty names?

  • @S0cialCrisis "Well I do know how old the Earth is. It's 4.6 billion years old."

    How do you know that? Based on the ambiguous dating methods of devious scientists? Creation has been proven. Open your eyes and look around you. Only a fool would claim that creation does not have a creator.

  • just shut the fuck up.. why cant more creationists do this?

  • @SoldierOfChrist110 You're thinking of the word "proof." There's plenty of evidence.

  • @S0cialCrisis I personally think that evolution obviously takes place, and I don't buy into a personal Deity. However, you do not know that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old. Please don't lower yourself to their level.

  • @SoldierOfChrist110 And I'll let you know that bit about the Big Bang is just flat out false. Look it up...it's a fascinating theory about how the universe started and there is significant evidence which supports it.

    Also, I'll save you the time it would take you to type, "Name ONE piece of evidence for the Big Bang." I'm not interested in doing your research for you, so you'll just have to educate yourself on this one (although I'm sure you won't).

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more