Thinking Requires the Laws of Logic which Require God

The proof for theism is impossible to overcome because all reasoning requires the law of non-contradiction and this law requires God.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Lord
• God
• descarte
• Bible
• Spinoza
• calvin
• luther
• mcdowell
• ravi
• zacharias
• sartre
• camus
• ten
• commandments
• false
• greg
• bahnsen

[Goddoesexist]

God is necessary for epistemic certainty. Atheism is self-conflagrating & impossible, hence theism is certain.

For the Laws of logic that are universal, immutable, transcendent, non-tangible, atemporal cannot be the case unless God exists as universal in knowledge, immutable, transcendent, non-tangible, atemporal is the case, since the Laws of Logic must be the case (to deny this one must utilize and make a pre-commitment that the Laws of Logic as thus stated) God exists must also be the case.

[Goddoesexist]

One unrelenting, always before you proof: The Laws of Thought must be utilized and presupposed in Everything that you ponder, ruminate, speak and act. These Laws are immaterial, universal and immutable. The cosmos lacks these attributes thus can't ground them. God alone has these attributes to account for these Laws. God must exist.

[Goddoesexist]

Just try NOT employing the laws of logic anywhere at anytime, God alone has the epistemic credentials of universality, immutability, endless perseverance, etc., to ground the Laws of Logic.

[Goddoesexist]

I do not connect it to logical thinking but to the Laws of Logic. These Laws are immaterial immutable and universal and only God who is immaterial immutable universal in scope can ground these Laws.

God must exist, the contrary is not possible.

[canibalcorpse73]

A couple minutes on a utube video cannot begin to explain how powerful presup apologetics are. I spent about 40 pages of back and forth dialogue on a forum before the others finally started to understand that they were indeed very irrational. I was the only one really making sense most of the time. I would suggest all the nay sayers to put there money where their mouth is and go talk with someone good at it for at least an hour, you will be contradicting yourself left and right.

[gininginin]

Of course logic requires a god. That would be Athena, the goddess of logic and invention. Praise her to avoid torture in the Hades!

[NotWhollySane]

Spongebob Squarepants grounds all logic, and anybody that argues that Spongebob doesn't exist is arguing agianst logic itself since Spongebob is the foundation of all logic. Therefore Spongebob exists.

So these irrational A-Spongebobists are irrationally walking into the fog of wishful thinking because logic demands that Spongebob exists.

Oh and that is called a reductio ad absurdum you asshat. :)

[kaxitaksi]

"Thinking Requires the Laws of Logic which Require God" Correction.. This construct is totally illogical.

[kaxitaksi]

"Thinking Requires the Laws of Logic which Require God" Erhh.. that doesn't work.. has not worked for 2000 years now.

[megagrey]

Blah blah blah, the same old "Only my imaginary friend can be the source of logic/morality/energy/matter" routine. Fail.

[CuntTornado]

@YHWHisSovereign An all powerful being could create an illogical universe, or cause the universe to become illogical at any given moment. If that being cannot violate the laws of logic, it is subject to them like the rest of us, and they exist on their own as I said.

[YHWHisSovereign]

@CuntTornado Omnipotence does not require God to be able to lie, create a rock so big that He cannot lift it, create something with the property of A and not A at the same time and in the same place, in other words, even though He cannot violate His own morale and logical character, He is still omnipotent.

[CuntTornado]

@YHWHisSovereign Then God is not omnipotent.