Angelina Jolie Interview 2008 "George Wallace"

From the George Wallace Dvd (2009)

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Angelina
• Cornelia
• George
• Interview
• Jolie
• Wallace

[incachica1]

was this ever a movie? did it come out in theatres?

[Far8Far]

Yes, George Wallace came out in 1997 to tv(HBO)

[korniejolie]

thanks, is this in the special feature of the new released DVD?? i love this interview.

[Far8Far]

Yeah it's the only special feature on the dvd. The version with a lot of the cast that isn't cut is 20 min. long.

[lippy170]

god looking at angie on that boat megan fox isnt even close;

[kyleena250]

shes so cute talkin in that accent and singing

[HairdoAngel]

@Far8Far can you at least put the whole thing of them making it... bcuz not only was i fascinated by angies acting i was also fascinated of others work... the cat and crews that made it all work out....

[glitchiker1]

What I mean to say is that an over reach of the states is only as good as the good president in office. JFK was a very good president, and his over reach of the states was justified in that he has issued a prior order to strip the Federal Reserve from charging any interest on currency. This would have ended slavery totally. Since this order was removed then the zone of coverage of slavery only expanded out. So in essence Wallace was right all along.

[glitchiker1]

Proverbs 23:1-3. They expanded the zone of coverage of slavery out with the over reach of the states, and they used the civil rights movement to do this. State sovereignty was set up under the Articles of Confederation, and the first attempt to rid of this was "The Civil War", which was a bankers war. The Constitution points to the Articles of Confederation and not any other document. It would have worked had JFK's EO11110 had not been retracted.

[glitchiker1]

The CFR's reasons for opposing Wallace had nothing to do with race or color, it had only to do with state sovereignty. Again the true motive of the agenda was masked by the civil rights movements. Of course the Freemasons are supposedly not connected with the round table groups. This is almost true. Each of the lower levels of the pyramid have at least several members who are connected to the structure at the higher levels. In other words the skids were greased.

[glitchiker1]

Those who think Wallace was behind the Assassination of JFK do not understand how FreeMasonry works let alone the CFR. The CFR ran by the Vatican and the Crown actively opposed Wallace's stance on intergration. The Freemasons are a divided organization and this is on purpose so that those who are evil can hide behind those who are good. Just like the FBI and CIA are not totally evil orgs. The outer perimeter cloaks the core of both of these orgs.

[glitchiker1]

JFK, RFK, MLK, MALCOLM X, and George Wallace were all good men, who got on the wrongs side of the banking cartel. The FBI and the CIA were responsible for creating revolution in the US. Both of these organizations were founded by the criminally ran syndicate known as the Federal Reserve Private Bank. They also act along side secret societies like the Jesuits and Templars. The Vatican is pulling the strings behind the scenes.

[glitchiker1]

You cant do Presidential Proclamation 3542 without coupling it with EO11110. They are 2 orders that belong with each other. They speak of Abraham Lincolns views of the US. So when Kennedy was assassinated, his EO11110 was retracted immediately. Just like the Contraction Act of 1866 right after Lincoln was assassinated. Kennedies over reach of the states is only as good as the good president in office. When criminals run the office of president this over reach can't be good.

[glitchiker1]

They had that accurate about it at least. George Wallace did not get the memo. JFK's EO11110 was issued 7 days prior to presidential proclamatin 3542. Kennedy was rogue in this thing trying to change it. Either Wallace could not understand what JFK was up to, or he did not get the memo. Really you could not ask for anything better than the way it went. JFK and Wallace both deserve props for being who they are.

[glitchiker1]

I understood that this movie is not entirely accurate. George Wallace was not at all pleased with the police riot. He was infuriated with Alabama's police chief. This movie has more misinterpretation in it about George Wallace. It is no different than the entire misunderstanding they had of him in the civil rights movement. Plus he changed his views on segregation later on. He stated that he only supported it because he promised it to Alabama.

[xxEllexxx]

wow I hate this witch *cough* sorry,woman...