Rant about youtube copyright policy

It makes me sick how the likes of some tubers are blatantly using copyright footage in order to gain views under fair usage policy.

To me it just proves that youtube should tighten its grip on these users. They need to make it mandatory that if a user doesn't have the explicit permission to showcase copyright material they should lose their channel or at least be suspended.

It is not about copyright law its about justice and recognition for the youtubers that have worked hard to produce work on youtube which is original. Yet they are always surpassed by wasters that use clips of other popular work in order to get their first.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• copyright
• infringement
• youtube
• terms
• of
• service
• unfair
• advantage
• scab
• waste
• space
• tos
• you
• tube
• change
• in
• policy
• free
• new
• account
• speech
• member
• nowhere
• freedom
• rare
• mirror
• censorship
• suspended
• banned
• members
• educational
• vlog
• news
• google

[SiNapses77]

Just stumbled across this and what absolute twoddle. You should understand your subject matter before spouting unintelligible nonsense. Youtube terms and conditions cannot supersede copyright law because Youtube does not transcend Copyright law. Youtube is not a legislative body capable of banning people for fair usage material because they themselves would be subject to counter claims. Stop uploading this utter drivel and spamming up youtube.

[Aspergianstar2009]

But unlike Turdis I do not brag about people i have met. I could state I have met most of the cast at Longleat. I could state that I have a signed AUtograph by Ainley. I could state a lot of things. I touched the Peter Davison Original Console. I met Pat T. I could say a lot. But I don't. Because unlike you Turd Boys I am a true fan of the series not a stupid little kid that jumps on the bandwagon just to get views.

[SiNapses77]

@Aspergianstar2009 Pointless me replying to this but you've got a bite out of me so - at 33 I hardly consider myself a 'boy' ... and ... 31 years of following Doctor Who does not make me a 'Johnny Come Lately' either. You jettisoned your original argument regarding Copyright in favour of your usual antagonism. Frankly if you don't like Will then that is your concern but your current modus operandi is akin to that of 'a stupid liltte kid'. You're a grown man heckling students. Move on.

[Aspergianstar2009]

@SiNapses77 Nah I had to look this up as I just glanced across your copyright. Now listen to me carefully I don't have to bother Turdis or you on anything I have made it and you can see my credentials on the banner. I have not seen any evidence Turdis is partnered with 2 entertain apart from what he actually says. I also make more views than him and have been around a lot longer than him. So basically he is no threat to me. But I do feel that copyright has to be addressed

[Aspergianstar2009]

Coincidently its been ages since I made this video I am moving on . I do not agree he is a true fan of Doctor Who I think there are a number now that are jumping on the band wagon simply because it is popular to be into it. Where as true fans have like yourself followed it over the years. True fans are also concerned about the direction the show is taking and the BBC losing interest as well. This video was done ages ago anyway

[thelashers]

well the bbc actually like mrtardis's reviews of doctor who so then he does have permission

[Aspergianstar2009]

Also I have yet to hear why CE never got back to Turdis about the so called review he was going to do with the 9th Doctor. Had he been ill as Turdis stated it would have been posponed not cancelled if there was any interest in him actually doing it. Its very naive of you to think that a stupid 19 year old kid is going to be able to interview any of The Doctors. Seb of Doctor Who Online was a good mate of mine. I have spoken to Colin Baker and a number of them

[SiNapses77]

@Hi675445 No no no, lets get this clear for all, Youtube may indeed choose to delete or close an account for copyright infringements ... but ... all Youtube users can make counter claim this action with the weight of the law. Youtube is not a legislative body for copyright and has to respect copyright law when meting out punishment for what they deem copyright misdemeanour's. It doesn't matter if it break the t&c's of Youtube because they are stipulating law as the reason for cancellation.

[Hi675445]

another example is I have a minecraft ever and one rules is don't destroy over people work now that not a law and not illegal in the real world but it is on my sever it was dose to stop people destroying the place this is the same for youtube

[Hi675445]

if U brake youtube rules U can get in trouble dose not matter if it is not law eg you colud live on your own island that has no laws but your video can still be deleated and your channal can be remove becouse u proke there site rules

[SiNapses77]

@Aspergianstar2009 Indeed, the video was done ages ago but It was surprising to see you still preaching about Will as recent as July. Whilst I do not necessarily agree with your assessment - I have no issue with young fans jumping on the bandwagon if it means they invest their time watching 'classic' who, the heart of the series - I can agree to disagree and leave it that.

[PsychoSebastian]

@Aspergianstar2009 Well, the BBC is very protective of their Material. If they did consider MrTardisreviews as a copy right violation, they would have shut him off long ago. Report him to the BBC, if you feel they are missing him. The material used is property of the BBC afterall. And I still don't understand your whole point. Does one get a pot of gold or narcs for more subscriptions to one's channel? Or is it a mere ego thing? My "chan" is bigger stuff. I do not run a chan, so I'm just curious