Full Interview with John Edwards -- 3 of 3
Loading...
Loading...
1,402
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 4:28Republicans vs. Capitalism - James Kotecki on F...by JamesKotecki394 views
- 5:05Admiral Ackbar Jokes on FOX News (starting abou...by JamesKotecki850 views
- 3:24Comparing Newt Gingrich to Chris Farley on FOX ...by JamesKotecki436 views
- 0:44FOX News Hit - Behind the Scenes - 12/27/11by JamesKotecki463 views
- 14:49John Edwards Part 1by NikiSeberini640 views
- 3:01John Edward - Psychic Mediumby YourInfiniteQuest33,753 views
- 5:38Full Interview with John Edwards -- 1 of 3by JamesKotecki2,903 views
- 0:16Stan Marsh on "The Big Questions" & Religionby Tourima47,451 views
- 10:56John Edwards ABC "NightLine" Interview On Adult...by SaveOurSovereignty256,645 views
- 5:54Senator John Edwards: The YouTube Interviewby citizentube67,255 views
- 2:40Walk a day in my shoes: John Edwards/Elaine Ellisby SEIU6,836 views
- 2:28Tomorrow Begins Todayby johnedwards175,721 views
- 3:51John Edwards Admits Affairby CBS38,890 views
- 0:31John Edwards - "Season" TV Adby johnedwards70,381 views
- 8:21"Diane Sardone" "Debbie Schaefer" "John Rispoli...by arachfalski160 views
- 1:36Senator John Edwards on Medical Marijuana--Sept...by livefreenh40,768 views
- 6:47What's Caucus Day Like? Take A Look...by johnedwards24,180 views
- 3:12John Edwards' Fall From Graceby ABCNews1,268 views
- 14:12Bill Maher "How Come John Edwards Is The Worst ...by MOXNEWSd0tCOM22,872 views
- 10:34John Edwards ABC "NightLine" Interview On Adult...by SaveOurSovereignty2148,689 views
your videos are ghay. thank god for you that YouTube/Google is an online media branch for the ultra-liberal wing of the Democrat Party.
wowzers987654321 4 years ago
yea...........he said that to me as well..on that thing with the stuff
rodgazinya 4 years ago
I'll be labelled partisan and/or a conspiracy nut for this (which is true), but if you REALLY wanna start to have smaller fora, Dodd and Gravel should drop out, for starters. I honestly don't know what the former stands for (except to take up space) and the latter is so incoherent that he's clearly a plant to distract attention from/marginalize Kucinich and his agenda, that it's ridiculous.
breaks0 4 years ago
Nice one asking him about the exclusion question! His answer, while nice in principle, is essentially a rewording of what he was caught by Fox suggesting to Hilary. Who would determine how to divide up the groups and how would you reduce the size while putting frontrunners AND "secondary" together in a fair manner. He and she have yet to address those issues.
breaks0 4 years ago
I don't get why I got a subscription update for this video, I have not even subscribed...
MrYork 4 years ago
should have given John a gamer's headset.
DCUPtoejuice 4 years ago
Rather than have fewer people in the debate, just cover fewer issues at one sitting. A debate on healthcare, another on immigration. This would provide an opportunity for more depth, rather than sound bites. Plus it would feel more democratic and not reek of "old media" exclusionary tactics. What do you think John? Will you attend? I'm sure James would be willing to moderate...
Great job James. Keep the hard questions coming.
gary
ExpertVoter(dot)org
gdstark 4 years ago
Excellent job. Top notch. Wish you'd carry this attitude to KoteckiandMcMillan.
berliita 4 years ago