As an architect I consider REVIT to be a presentation tool once a building has been configured. It is too rigid and tedious to be a design tool. As for working drawings, it lacks the ability to clip and paste from old jobs, due to intelligent objects and is not cost effective . REVIT takes an enormous amount of upfront data input which does not coincide with the project billing cycle.Because the architect or engineer does not control contracting, claims of conflict avoidance are meaningless.
As an architect I consider REVIT to be a presentation tool once a building has been configured. It is too rigid and tedious to be a design tool. As for working drawings, it lacks the ability to clip and paste from old jobs, due to intelligent objects and is not cost effective . REVIT takes an enormous amount of upfront data input which does not coincide with the project billing cycle.Because the architect or engineer does not control contracting, claims of conflict avoidance are meaningless.
cloudsurfer007 1 week ago
looks like simcity :D
charioTR 1 month ago