Petter Solberg Testing Formula 1 car Ferrari

Petter Solberg from 0 - 200 in 3.5 seconds, this is MC last used car.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Petter
• Solberg
• Testing
• Formula1
• car
• Ferrari
• f1

[Keegz2k7]

Petter and Richard Burns, are my Favourites

Petter has been my favourite from a young age!

and im 14 now,

petter is one of the WRC drivers, that HAS Time for his fans!

unlike, Loeb or anyone else,

they are too ignorrant to get out and talk to you!

Also, Petter is very talented!

and a great driver+man

excellent video

5*+favourite+subscribed

[TricksterStuff]

agreed, have talked to Petter may times, and he lives 5 min away from me :)

[Keegz2k7]

oops you are from norway :P

are you in spyderberg? :P

[TricksterStuff]

Yea :)

[domtv1]

Petter has always been my best wrc driver and Kimi has always been my best F1 driver, so in monza it would be BRILLIANT if petter raced in the second ferrari :)

[sorgic435]

Ever since Subaru quit WRC they really don't show it on TV in US cause nobody care about rest of the cars and Loeb!

[paulio2293]

@muddwell F1 cars are (comparativley) SLOW from 0-100. They can only use arround 40-50% of their maximum power from 0-100. Most of their speed is in the range 150-300 because they can apply full power without going sideways. 0-200 time is arround 4.5 seconds for an f1 car

[muddwell]

@rallyramone that is pretty awesome. I always watch the WRC when I can.

[rallyramone]

@muddwell Both cars are great, but built for very different purposes. Still wrc has 34mm turbo restrictor to limit output bit over 300hp. 80's group B cars and European rallycross cars are real deal with unrestricted 500-800hp and lightweight bodys. Div. A rallycross car has been clocked 2.2s to 100kmh and could easily beat f1 on fair dragrace on grippy tarmac. Well rallycross cars can peak boost over 50psi ;D

[muddwell]

@rallyramone for a wrc car, torque is what you want. pulling out of slow speed corners, powering out of slides and the rest. back to what I said, the reason the wrc & F1 was such a close match because it couldnt get any grip. any serious 4wd vehicle would have beaten the F1 car off the line. on a racetrack, the F1 would slaughter the wrc. youre pretty biased and uninformed about F1, so errr, dont worry too much about replying.

[rallyramone]

@muddwell Hp dont matter, its all about torque and grip. F1 has about 320Nm and rwd wrc has +600Nm, anti-lag and superb traction. In Finland we say that rally cars are sold with horsepowers, but results are done with Newtonmeters...

[muddwell]

@rallyramone I guess it was that F1 vs plane vs WRC? That was a dirty ass runway, so it was more about 4wd than hp.

[muddwell]

@rallyramone thats pretty odd. I know top gear isnt the most credible show, but they did a WRC vs F1 vs road car around silverstone. The WRC needed a 30 second headstart or something. Group B was pretty nuts, but they still wouldnt have the power the weight of an F1 car. Is that vid on youtube?

[rallyramone]

@muddwell Still redbull f1 lost to Ford focus wrc on airfield. F1 cars only work on ideal conditions. Old Group B rally cars were faster on gravel roads of finland than turbo era F1 machines on track.

[muddwell]

@rallyramone I think F1 'cars' manage around 0-100 in around 2 seconds. Depends on grip, tyes, TC etc. 0-200 in 3.5 sounds a bit optimistic, under 5 seconds wouldnt suprise me though.