Ahlul Bayt tv - Sunni Brother questions a Shiiyah Shayk while he commits 'OPEN SHIRK' sunni SHIA

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,779
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 18, 2010

This a video (by 3raqi906) a reply to a salafi propaganda video with a similar title (to clarify any confusion SHIA ISLAM SHIA MUSLIMS) which had same title (slightly worse) watch also video 5 of Biography of Imam Ali for further info at 2 minutes 20 seconds. On the 12th Muharram, a battered and bruised Sakina was tied to the back of a camel so she would not fall off, her hair was bedraggled and her glance was traumatised. Zainab (as) and Imam Sajjad (as) heart wept but they were humanely 'helpless'.

Zainabs hands, the same hands that had that were embraced by her mother when she was a child and then nursed her mother, when she was beaten (because Muslims of Medina had become cultural) were now bruised and stained with the blood of Hussain, Aon, Mohammed Qasim and her reason for living Ali Akbar. They were not only bruised but they were tied behind her meaning there was no way to reach out to comfort Sakina. The names of those whose blood stained the hands of Zainab (as) Hussain, Ali Akbar, Aon, Muhammed, Qasim. Each name , Each martyr had a very real living history which was well known to Zainab (as). Their memories were etched on Zainabs heart and the head of Ali Asghar on the lance that goaded Rabaab was still in sight. (per the words someone Allah 'wanted Zainab paraded' and 'orchestrated the whole event' 'period' Mazallah, when we have people like this within us who neeeds enemies). Zainab thought deep thoughts that day and the flame within her swore they would never be forgotten. So her glance returned to Sakina and Said 'Fear not my child for we live for a higher cause as we are the daughters of Haider and When I arise and bare witness the world will be shaken and your flame alone will set the world free. However, to some (including role models) it was a distant memory as they ate their cake where the poor could not afford to come on the 12th Muharram, To them perhaps this is what it meant to be Hussain like. They did not think twice about attending, may be the expensive fee was the reason, but I would say no, not so at all rather they genuinely thought and have over the years been fooled into thinking that by being there they were being 'Hussain Like'.
Yet within you, you as weak anad as flawed as you may be, have the power to break free, not be a cultural Hussaini, but a real Hussaini and stop this slippery slide. The doors of a repentence based on resolve are open.

The religion of Hussain is not a personal one (Like Christianity confined to the home) but a revolutionary one, which means freedom for all, even if you become ashes in the candle of Hussain. Where you in the spirit of Hussain are a catalyst to revolutionise your society. New schools of thought will come and go, trying to dampen the fire of Hussain within you, but the Hussaini's that know their Markaz is Hussain and not the turban will never be fooled. Everything that has come up against Hussain(as) has persihed and so will it remain. Peace be upon the Master of Martyrs, who freed the conscious's of those that reach him. ahlulbayt tv ahlebait tv hidayat tv salaam tv see also other videos for shabedari london yom e aza An interview with Shia Muslim part 1 Al-Hassan ibn Ali & Muawiyah made cease fire did not surrender his right shia sunni debate english sunni vs shia

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (makesUquestion)

  • first of all tell us who betrayed zaid ibn e ali?

  • @naghar25 Salaam, you are cutting your nose to spite your face. You compare the betrayal of Zaid ibn e ali , to the betrayal of the prophet (saww), what kind of Sunni are you? In anycase whoever they were, if they regarded him as their Imam, they were not followers of the school of Ahlulbayt (as). Instead of giving shallow and false 'justification', have the courage to say the companions that ran away were very wrong to do so. Salaam

  • @makesUquestion all the companians who fought the battle of uhud also fought many other battles.if u say they betrayed holy prophet why they were allowed by the prophet(pbuh) to take part in other battles.?

  • @naghar25 Salaam brother, inshallah you are well. The Holy Prophet (saww) came to help people do good not be a hinderance. There are various reasons including to let them make ammends, to show them their true worth as warriors (or limitations), and them and you and I their warrior status compared to Imam Ali (as) and that Imam Ali (as) rescued the day always. Taking part is not the same as winning battles or indeed actually fighting. History is silent on victims of first 3 in Battles, per me.

  • @makesUquestion Also in his final worldly days the prophet (saww), was very frail and to clear the way for Imam Ali (as), he ordered some of the famous companions to go under the command of Usam a Ibn Zaid to fight iin a campaighn and they refused, clearly disobeying the holy prophet (saww).

see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @a4fkntrippen firstly u need to learn akhlaaq not me, don't know to respect the companions of nabi(SAWS) then u ppl preach akhlaaq to others, what a hypocrisy ?

  • @naghar25 Thats not the point. The Point is Muslims are all prone to error. We condemn the acts of some of the Companions........... But for some reason you tell a Sunni brother about history from their own books and they call you a Kafir because you have spoken bad about the companions. Its mind boggling.

  • @truislam123 Go read your own books. You guys seem to think all the Companions were PERFECT. How many perfect friends do you have bro?

    Have a open mind like how you tell Christians and Jews. Dont be a hypocrite go read your own books.

  • @avinashptl11 nice akhlaak

    

  • again the references quoted by the so called scholars are weak..HAZRAT Umar did not flee the battle of uhud referenced:Tafsir Ibn Kathir:There remained between a hundred and eighty Companions with the Prophet . These included Abu Bakr, `Umar, Al-`Abbas, `Ali, Al-Fadl bin `Abbas, Abu Sufyan bin Al-Harith, Ayman the son of Umm Ayman and Usamah bin Zayd.

    also in al-Bidaya wal-Nihaya of Ibn Kathir and countless of otheres the shia need stop spreading propaganda against the sahaba.!!!!

  • @makesUquestion What do you think of Aisha , the mother of the believers ? I am a new muslim and don't know much about that ? does a believer attack his mother ?And if he does , is he still a believer ?

  • @truislam123 GO AND READ SAHI BUKHARI IT IS WRITTEN THERE WE R NOT LIERS IT IS U PEOPLE WHO R LIERS.FOLLOWERS OF MAVIA AND YAZEED

  • @avinashptl11 WHEN U DONT HAVE ANSWER U START TALKING BULSHIT

  • shia the mf's, produce of 3 day mutaah's ha ha..

  • OH SHIAS MAY ALLAH CURSE ALL OF U FOR SPREADING LIES AND DECEPTIONS ABOUT THE COMPANIONS OF THE PROPHET(PBUH) ESPECIALLY UMAR AND ABU BAKR, U SHIAS ARE NOT MUSLIMS U ARE ALL KUFFAR MAY ALLAH CURSE U MORE THEN U ALREADY ARE CURSED. THATS Y U BEAT URSELFS TO A PULP EVERTY YEAR ITS CAUSE OF THE BACKSTABBING AND LIES U IMPLUED ON URSELFS . U ARE THE BIGGGEST DISBELIEVERS EVER. PLS ALLAH I ASK U, STOP THESSE DISBELIEVERS FROM SPREADING MORE LIES ABOUT UR RELIGION. AAAAAAAMMMMMMEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNN­NNNN

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more