Big Bang..... consciousness....... and wave-duality model.....

www.uncoverself.com

This is a short video relating the wave-duality model and consciousness..... Perhaps consciousness was involved in the Big Bang?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Big Bang
• consciousness
• wave-duality

[avedic]

you're beautiful. so my type. and your video is quite interesting. consciousness is the most fascinating thing there is.

[Uncoverself]

@avedic Thanks for your feedback :) consciousness and mind power is incredible! I'm surprised that so many people haven't uncovered what power they have within!

[astudyofeverything]

So you mean... "nothing occurs until a conscious being sees it"... 99% professional scientists don't subscribe to that opinion but that's cool beans, you can believe that if you like.

Just be aware that a whole group of people much smarter than you or I don't believe it.

[Uncoverself]

@astudyofeverything 99% of science is becoming as inflexible as religion. Scientists are terrified of keeping their minds open to alternative ideas, in case their whole framework collapses. They can keep of searching aimlessly for answers, if they enjoy it ... they can keep breaking matter down into smaller bits - but there still needs to be consciousness to observe this, otherwise it doesn't really exist.

[TheChriscruse1989]

@astudyofeverything wow your lost, my simple point was that the point of anything occuring is for consciousness. what other reason would there be?

[astudyofeverything]

@astudyofeverything You're saying that dinosaurs exist because there was a raptor that was alive to see it? No consciousness has never 'seen' an electron but we can make supercomputers. In astronomy, there is this little thing called concordance. Many pieces of completely different evidence, pointing to the same conclusion. e.g. Stellar evolution models the CMB, galaxy positions, absorption characteristics in the IGM all simultaneously point to a big bang having occurred. We can't *see* them.

[TheChriscruse1989]

@astudyofeverything no, your comparison to dinasours is incorrect because thats a creature that has consciousness of life, and there were other forms of life back then. comparing that to the big bang is a bad comparisson because there were no forms of life to observe it. whats the point of something happening if its never experienced in any way and has no effect on anything?

[astudyofeverything]

Your query is simply the old adage... if a tree falls in the forrest, but no one sees it, does it make a sound? Cosmologists assume induction (predictability) of Universe. Just because we can't go back to the age of the dinosaurs, doesn't mean they don't exist, we can infer their existence from secondary evidence (fossils etc). The same goes for the start of the universe - the state of our universe suggests a beginning, we don't need an 'observer' to be there for it to have actually occurred.