YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Judaism and Capitalism | David Gordon

misesmedia misesmedia·436 videos
33,468
3,809
Like     Dislike 5

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like misesmedia's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike misesmedia's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add misesmedia's video to your playlist.

Published on Mar 12, 2012

The Lou Church Memorial Lecture in Religion and Economics. Recorded 9 March 2012 at the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. Includes an introduction by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (80)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • TimeWarp66

    You're a piece of shit. Now get lost you big dummy.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TimeWarp66's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TimeWarp66's comment.
    in reply to QCREIGN (Show the comment)
  • Sarah Browne

    Did he just say A-Jew-mulation? lol

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Sarah Browne's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Sarah Browne's comment.
  • xcvsdxvsx

    Why might it be justified in the context of worship if it is not justified in other contexts?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.
    in reply to mtanousable (Show the comment)
  • mtanousable

    What I meant was the context was a chapter entitled "Instructions on Worship" (or some variant thereof). So it is possible that Paul is correct that *during worship and in church dealings* that women and men have certain roles, as he wrote Timothy. Or not. I can't really argue to this specific passage and its meaning. I only wanted to note that it only applies to the procedure for worship and church leadership, and not all of life.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mtanousable's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mtanousable's comment.
    in reply to xcvsdxvsx (Show the comment)
  • xcvsdxvsx

    ok so i read the chapter, i see that timothy is not claiming that these are the words of god but neither is he claiming that this is purely how he feels things should be done. "This is good, and pleases God our Savior" he is making objective claims. So do you believe timothy is correct when he says that these are the qualities god desires in his female followers? If not than do you believe that sometimes apostles are wrong but everything that is a quotation from god is correct?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.
    in reply to mtanousable (Show the comment)
  • mtanousable

    The context is the internal workings of the church, in an age where having the women teach was frowned upon by even most women. Whether that is the way the church should be run or not is obviously debatable, but that context is important.

    Without it, it would be similar to leaving off the "in self-defense" part of "it is acceptable to kill someone in self-defense".

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mtanousable's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mtanousable's comment.
    in reply to xcvsdxvsx (Show the comment)
  • xcvsdxvsx

    or you know we can punish those who commit crimes on an individual basis and treat everyone else as equals.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.
    in reply to QCREIGN (Show the comment)
  • xcvsdxvsx

    By all means, enlighten me. Forget what the actual context is just give me ANY conceivable context you can imagine where that passage makes sense. Oh and one rule, nothing stupid like "a person is being held hostage and the assailant hands the victim a note and instructs the victim to read it out loud".

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate xcvsdxvsx's comment.
    in reply to mtanousable (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later