@Loejyrrab, Nobody in the Obama administration ever claimed that Ghaddafi's ancient alliance with terror was the rationale for US intervension. We were told it was humanitarian, although it probably had more to do with keeping libyan oil flowing and to get more of it to flow westwards. I think the fact Ghaddafi's sponsorshp for terror in the past isolated him, making it easier to sell this intervension, whereas we could never have gotten support to intervene in Syria or Egypt.
Our Cia has launched many a false flag event and under both democrat and republican administrations. I have some bad news for you, if Ron Paul doesn't get elected we're every bit as screwed with Obama as we will be with the republican whores.
@Loejyrrab If the Democrats were against the Iraq war, they should've demanded a declaration of war instead of deferring war powers to the president. President Obama (during his 2008 campaign) said he would end the war in Iraq in 16 months. 2009 and 2010 went by and NOTHING CHANGED. We need a third party to challenge the Democrat/Republican control of Congress.
@Loejyrrab Clean up the mess? Haha. You mean your Owe Bama who was going to end the wars and started another one. Which one of these wars were declared by the way? Liberals can't do anything without conservatives by design.
You cock sucking egghead George Will, did you forget that Lybia DID attack us. Ghaddafi's terrorists blew up a TWA airliner over Lockerbie, killing 300 Americans. Old Momar admitted as much and paid off to avoid getting bombed. Conversly, Iraq NEVER attacked the USA, yet you Republiscums under Bush/Cheney threw away the lives of 6K US soldiers in order to kill Saddam. The GOP is the party of war mongering, but you're unable to finish the wars you start. Democrats have to clean up the mess.
@Loejyrrab, Nobody in the Obama administration ever claimed that Ghaddafi's ancient alliance with terror was the rationale for US intervension. We were told it was humanitarian, although it probably had more to do with keeping libyan oil flowing and to get more of it to flow westwards. I think the fact Ghaddafi's sponsorshp for terror in the past isolated him, making it easier to sell this intervension, whereas we could never have gotten support to intervene in Syria or Egypt.
gim10003 1 month ago
i hope someone doesn't call him "antisemitic".
knightschwartz 1 month ago
@Loejyrrab
I'm afraid you're a victim of propaganda.
Our Cia has launched many a false flag event and under both democrat and republican administrations. I have some bad news for you, if Ron Paul doesn't get elected we're every bit as screwed with Obama as we will be with the republican whores.
fourthtunz 1 month ago
@MishuTaste
uh, we're out of iraq.
juarezrt 2 months ago
Theres a reason politicians lust for war. Eisenhower warned us about it as he was leaving office.
rubbersole79 3 months ago
@Loejyrrab If the Democrats were against the Iraq war, they should've demanded a declaration of war instead of deferring war powers to the president. President Obama (during his 2008 campaign) said he would end the war in Iraq in 16 months. 2009 and 2010 went by and NOTHING CHANGED. We need a third party to challenge the Democrat/Republican control of Congress.
MishuTaste 4 months ago
@Loejyrrab Clean up the mess? Haha. You mean your Owe Bama who was going to end the wars and started another one. Which one of these wars were declared by the way? Liberals can't do anything without conservatives by design.
AroundSun 4 months ago
You cock sucking egghead George Will, did you forget that Lybia DID attack us. Ghaddafi's terrorists blew up a TWA airliner over Lockerbie, killing 300 Americans. Old Momar admitted as much and paid off to avoid getting bombed. Conversly, Iraq NEVER attacked the USA, yet you Republiscums under Bush/Cheney threw away the lives of 6K US soldiers in order to kill Saddam. The GOP is the party of war mongering, but you're unable to finish the wars you start. Democrats have to clean up the mess.
Loejyrrab 5 months ago