Who is Peter Duesberg ?

Three cheers for Peter Duesberg!

In this month's June 2008 issue of DISCOVER science magazine, there's an in-depth article about renegade cell biologist Peter Duesberg. And, in the article, he mentions my book!

It's a uniquely insightful and thorough article, done by Jeanne Lenzer. It has great photos by Howard Cho and, of course, it stars the bad boy of biology, Peter Duesberg!

Thanks for the mention, Dr. Duesberg. It means the world to me.

(To learn more about Peter Duesberg and the battle which made him notorious across the entire and vast medical industry, check out the first video on this link: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/video/

I won't lie; it's a long video -- about two hours long -- but it's well worth setting aside a block of time to watch.)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• peter
• duesberg
• logic
• junkie
• david
• jack
• thou
• shalt
• maggiore
• HIV
• cancer
• aneuploid
• AIDS
• pharma
• global
• warming
• discover

[1mhiv]

Duesberg is the man!

[afro20man]

They did the same to wilhelm reich...orgone energy...

[TheLogicJunkie]

What never ceases to astound me is just how wantonly, shamelessly Nellie Olsen you people really are -- you actually believe that you're medically incapable of ever being in the wrong, no matter what, and that thereby continues to give you license to endlessly moralize and rationalize every single galaxy of complaints against you, into seeming nothingness.

As the old joke goes, "What's the difference between God and a doctor? God doesn't believe he's a doctor."

Simply incredible.

[TheLogicJunkie]

I mean, yes, your industry HAS already begun to use its leverage with the FDA and the USDA and, by extension, governmental agencies like the FBI and so on, to literally bust down the doors of health food stores, aim guns at the faces of trembling owners and customers -- just like the megalomaniacal gestapo that you and your lot really and truly are at the bold bottom of things -- and actually STEAL their merchandise off their shelves and not even compensate them for their loss.

Give me a break.

[TheLogicJunkie]

@snillocgrom You're not "calling out" anything. Are you really this blind, that you really cannot see that most of the world no longer trusts you and your medical industry one damn bit, and that the only way you're ever going to re-entrench yourself in supremacy is if you actually leverage badge-wielding goons with guns to literally FORCE people to ONLY use you and your industry, ever again?

I mean, seriously. I've indulged this endless debate with you for the sake of good faith, but come on.

[snillocgrom]

@TheLogicJunkie It's not a distractor. I'm calling out your cynicism, which you utilize to fuel your arguments (can't imagine why anyone would think you're being slightly disingenuous when you start to talk about "simple logic"). I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt if I do not know them. That way, I don't piss them off.

[TheLogicJunkie]

And so, even if your assertion of -- for the sake of argument -- not having entered the field of medicine in order to make a career of lying to the masses is true, it's entirely possible that you may very well have entered the field without such a goal, and even began with the noblest of goals. But at some point, when confronted with at least the specter of compelling corruption on some issue or other, there begins the pathway of choice which can easily lead us to complicity.

[TheLogicJunkie]

So, with that in mind, if you really want to sit there and claim that I'm being "insulting" (as if out of completely unfounded nowhere) to openly state (because I've not passive-aggressively implied anything -- I've overtly stated it in numerous places) that people of overt conscientiousness haven't been ALLOWED into medicine in the first place for quite some time now, well, that's your business. So as you claim to be a morally offended person of virtue, you don't fit the mold.

[TheLogicJunkie]

Beyond that, however, all I know is what virtually every single pre-medical advisory program tells virtually every pre-medical prospective for at least the past 20 years about what NOT to put on their personal essay when applying for medical school: "I want to be a doctor because I want to help people."

If you put that, your entire application is basically ignored. Prospectives are told that the "correct" reason to give should paraphrase "I want to participate in supporting the industry".

[TheLogicJunkie]

Finally, I'm not a mind-reader, so I have no idea IF you really "decided in college to pursue a life of lying etc." (because your claims of being a doctor can't be substantiated at this point, nor should they trump the pure and commoner weight of simple logic), or if you really did that, WHY you did that. You imply you had virtuous motives -- well, okay.

But all of that is pomp and circumstance, a trump-tactic distractor from the argument at hand.