Punishment or Reward: Which Works Better on Behavior?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,848
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 13, 2009

This is the VOA Special English Health Report, from http://voaspecialenglish.com

Two recent studies have found that punishment is not the best way to influence behavior.One showed that adults are much more cooperative if they work in a system based on rewards.

Researchers at Harvard University in the United States and the Stockholm School of Economics in Sweden did the study. They had about two hundred college students play a version of the game known as the Prisoner's Dilemma. The game is based on the tension between the interests of an individual and a group.

The students played in groups of four. Each player could win points for the group, so they would all gain equally. But each player could also reward or punish each of the other three players, at a cost to the punisher.

Harvard researcher David Rand says the most successful behavior proved to be cooperation. The groups that rewarded it the most earned about twice as much in the game as the groups that rewarded it the least.

And the more a group punished itself, the lower its earnings. The group with the most punishment earned twenty-five percent less than the group with the least punishment.

The study appeared in September in the journal Science. The other study involved children. It was presented in September in California at a conference on violence and abuse.

Researchers used intelligence tests given to two groups. More than eight hundred children were ages two to four the first time they were tested. More than seven hundred children were ages five to nine. The two groups were retested four years later, and the study compared the results with the first test.

Both groups contained children whose parents used physical punishment and children whose parents did not.

The study says the IQs or intelligence quotients of the younger children who were not spanked were five points higher than those who were. In the older group, the difference was almost three points.

Murray Strauss from the University of New Hampshire worked with Mallie Paschall from the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation. Professor Strauss has written extensively about physical punishment of children. He says the more they are spanked, the slower their mental development. He also looked at average IQs in other nations and found them lower where spanking was more common.

What do you think are the best ways to correct misbehavior? Share your comments at voaspecialenglish.com.

And that's the VOA Special English Health Report.

(Adapted from a radio program broadcast 21Oct2009)

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @HeyItzMeDawg That's learned from Operant and observational learning.

  • Neither punishment nor reward are very effective in the long term. Motivation doesn't come from bribery or threats, it comes from an inherent sense of self-worth and commitment.

  • My name is Han seong, I was never hit as a child. Now I have an IQ of over 150. I am a genius! Parents, don't spank your kids if you want them to be smart like me!

  • I was spanked a lot as a child. I am now a

    math teacher with an engineer degree, math degree equivalent, and master in technology, I outright own my house clear and free, my $40,000 SUV, free and clear, my commuter car free and clear, I have a pretty wife, and a little girl, she can read over 100 words before two years old, and can read simple kinder books now at 2 years old. Oh by the way I believe in GOD.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more