MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: Government Leadership

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Rachel
• Private
• Profit

[Arroway2357]

So, who wants to break it to Rachel Maddow that the Ambassador Bridge, which is the busiest in North America in terms of trade volume - accounting for 25% of merchandise trade between the US and Canada - was built by a private company (and came in 9 months ahead of schedule)?

[NJLawmancom]

This video is so telling. It really is Ground Zero as to the difference between left and right. She says building a bridge like this will not be profitable for a company. What? Of course the company made a profit. Do people think companies should do things like this for a loss? Profit is not a bad word. So silly.

[jilajig2]

Fee-Fi-Fo-Fum, I smell the stink of a les-bi-an!

[strike4n]

MSNBC has lost so much credibility as the unofficial propaganda machine for the liberal movement. Lesbian like Rachel Maddow who seeks refuge on the left to protect her homosexuality. Keith Olberman, got caught donating money to democrats and the rest of their left-leaning anchors are nothing more than string-puppets of the Democratic Party.

[maconsumner]

@DanielTheSexiest Obama is already doing just that with the corporate welfare of GM and GE. He never seems to remember or even acknowledge the fact that the "jobs created" are going off shore because of the EPA and unfair trade treaties. This is with purpose and no accident. Mrs.. Maddow all but says that they want communal living in America. Stupid liberal arts educated cow.

[maconsumner]

@DanielTheSexiest All public works projects are done by "for profit" private companies. What she is suggesting is removing the profit margin from the projects and enslaving by force those who do the projects. Remember, their idea of the "health care" issue will enslave those in the medical profession by forcing them to take payment at under the value of their service. Net result is not that people will be lining up to become a Dr, just the opposite and that is were shortages will come in.

[DanielTheSexiest]

@maconsumner What does Maddow suggest, to invest in things where there is no profit? If so, for what purpose? If there building a bridge isn't profitable then by definition it would result in a loss. Is Maddow really suggesting that the government spends OUR money going to non profitable money losing resources? And she wonders why there are poor people in the world. It's not due to capitalism, but to foolish ideas like Maddows.

[DanielTheSexiest]

@maconsumner I agree completely. Maddow says, "It's not profitable for one company to build this," while pointing to the bridge. Yes it can be profitable for a company. I guess Maddow never heard of something called, tolls. There have been bridges built by private companies that have been profitable.

[maconsumner]

@DanielTheSexiest She is nothing more than a example of the limousine liberal crowd that are artistic in nature. They have no idea that what they are the champions of is nothing more than Communism with a nice new wrapper that they call "Progressivism". They even use all the same rhetoric with class warfare and demonization of those who have. She and all the other ass puppets on MSNBC don't even know that they were referred to as "useful fools" and they would be the first swinging from a rope

[DanielTheSexiest]

@Kyllo11 Haha, so true.

[DanielTheSexiest]

@maconsumner Best comment on here. I hate Maddow, and you perfectly described her stupidity.

[maconsumner]

Not every good idea is profit making for a company? How exactly do you expect to build these bridges without it being profit driven by companies that build bridges? There is a word that describes work without profit or gain for the individual, that word is slavery.