Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Dan Rather's account from November 25, 1963

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,487
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 28, 2010

Reporter Dan Rather was able to see the Zapruder footage and later narrated the film to CBS national television coverage, claiming that he saw the President's head "went forward with considerable violence." He failed to mention the backward motion made famous in the Oliver Stone movie, JFK. His omission seemed to confirm that the single shooter theory with just Oswald firing from the rear. When the Zapruder film became public, he was forced to apologize saying it was "an honest error."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @steel7112 You got it. Rather just read a script put in front of his lying ass by the CIA.

    Now, pay attention! it is starting to make the rounds on the internet that the so-called death photos of JFK - Is not JFK. I saw the evidence. The death photos are JD Tippit - the cop that HAD to be murdered minutes later. That is correct. JD Tippit was called Jack & Kennedy by his DPD friends for the most obvious reason.

    A body on demand to fit whatever shooting scenario was required to fool the public.

  • CBS television was founded by William Pawley a former OSS agent and an expert in psychological warfare.

    Of course CBS did a network special after the release of the Warren Report supporting it.

    All US media has been under CIA control since the 1940s with "Operation Mockingbird".

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Complete fiction, Dan, calculated to supported the official "lone gunman" fairy tale. Poor Dan probably was told the public would never see the Zapruder film and discover he was lying here.

  • @caessarion Yes, an interesting prospect.

    Most folk simply can't be bothered with having to think too hard about things.

  • @TheDeJureTour when I was 8 I told my dad I didnt want to watch the moon landing because it looked to fake. Today when i see it, knowing its fake, its even more fake. Why do fake ML vids have so many people defending the authenticity of it, whil JFK vids have no cialquiada?

  • @TheDeJureTour Yes it was Paley, I made an "honest error" like dan rather

  • @TheLensSolution Yes, I watched that broadcast live when it aired. I was 22-years old at the time, but I instinctively knew that everything coming out of his mouth was a lie, half-truth, distortion, or omission of fact/s.

    By the early 2000's? Yes, I think it would be safe to say that the u.s. shitstream media was by then fully owned and operated by the CIA, Pentagon, FBI, ADL/SPLC, and other subversive and anti-American groups and organizations.

  • @themeaningoflife38 You mean William S. Paley, not William Pawley?

  • @TheDeJureTour I agree with you. Peter Jennings is a scumbag for his "Oswald did it alone" JFK special in 2003. Absolutely full of lies and distortions. Peter Jennings was obviously bought by the CIA. Rather and Cronkite were not much better.

  • Google search the statement of Parkland nurse Patricia Hutton.She held a bandage on a huge exit wound in the REAR of JFK's head and she saw two entrance wounds from the FRONT.Her statement was Classified "Top Secret" for decades.

  • I like how Rather says he chose his words wrong... fine, but you did a visual example as well as what you saw.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more