Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Mumia Abu-Jamal -- Of Radicals And Extremists!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
8,058
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 31, 2007

For politicians words are weapons, which are used to sell images, such like Madison Ave. sells soap. Every so often, even the best product must be made "new" or "improved!"

And why shouldn't they? Hasn't it worked before?

We now sneer at the phrase 'weapons of mass destruction', but several years ago it rang in the head like a klaxon.

Is it radical or extremist to fight against foreigners who invade your country, and try to impose strangers who function as puppets for these foreigners?

Why is the administration never seen as "extremist" for invading a foreign country based on false pretenses? Why isn't it viewed as "extreme" for its mad plan to 'remake the face of the Middle East?'

Why isn't its response for the desperate acts of 19 men, (9/11), of invading a nation that had nothing to do with that act, seen as "extreme?"

That it isn't is largely because of the obedient services of the corporate media, which sought obscene ratings by playing the fear card, and waving the flag.

They did so because their paychecks are signed by big business, and this administration has been good for big business.

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Love the fact people call his words true

    Love the fact that people call him cop killer

    Love the fact no one can call him a liar

  • thank you for your time to post this. Excellent quality! Excellent ideas!

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • tgis was a really good mumia ep. me gusta

  • What's the backing track? P.S. Free Mumia!!!!

  • the people of the would must unite in would wide revolution we will stop this atrocitys.

  • @jakefree24, No way.

  • Listen, to be honest a lot of cops are bullies and law breakers just like the criminals they are supposed to protect us from. I am white and have dealt with real brutal simple minded pigs, totally unlike the TV ones. But you can't have it both ways. My guess is that not only did he do it, but the cop was being a real pig too.

  • He killed nobody, and for the record if anyone unfairly abused me I would kill them, especially a police officer who is supposed to serve and protect.

  • Your incredibly stupid if thats what you think he's saying. Like i'd bother to refute you, but clearly if your to stupid to comprehend the video words on your computer screen wont help.

  • not neccessarily because the reason for the right to bear arms is to protect yourself from threats to your life and if a police officer threatens your life and shoots you do you not have the right to shoot back? personally i dont believe violence solves anything just leads to more problems but i am just going by what the law of the land says. before the american revolution colonists killed british soldiers but today we call cop killers of that time the founders of our country.

  • True it wasn't premeditated. I'm no lawyer, but killing a cop during a crime is automatic death penalty thing

  • as i said even if he did kill faulkner it was the result of a confrontation between them which means that it was not premeditated murder which is legally defined as murder in the first degree which justifies the death penalty, but would be at the very most second degree or manslaughter which are not death penalty offenses and even if he did kill another man what makes him any worse than the politicians whose decisions kill thousands of innocent people all in the name of their own security.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more