Iraq War Conspiracy part 1 Petro Dollar

Petro dollar recycling, why America really attacked Iraq

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Iraq
• Conspiracy
• Oil
• War
• Sadam

[keithholden]

I could have removed a bit more but decided to leave it in so you have to watch part1 and part 2

[histube17]

I think this is the most logical reason of why US attack Iraq.....

US want to protect their dollar...

"War against terorism" slogan is just a mask.

[husyem]

its shocking how the same game is taking effect right now, with iran...

[rustyschackleford100]

My country makes me sick, we are nothing more than imperialist nazi pigs who deserve to burn in napalm.

[Black99Fox]

Libya wanted to get the whole of africa to sell its oil for gold too,makes sense after seeing this.

[TheCentralServices]

Hey, all un-stupid, un-obese and un-ignorant Americans:

What is the total cost and profit of the war in Iraq?

[MrPATSPAWN]

war is the base of human nature. the system needs reboot,with war out of the equation.modern man is weak and dillusional.money is a diversion.like a cheap parlor trick.we all know this civilization will run its course as many others of the past.saudi arabia put u.s.dollar on the map,i beleive in the 1950's correct me on date.black gold pssst a diversion for the blue gold.the water we drink.all major companies are millitary owned,meaning some one out there isn't happy,until we are all dead.

[SecretSoceity]

@SDS4BO There was no direct tractionable evidence for the existence of WMD's in Iraw either.

[SecretSoceity]

This is not a conspiracy, it is obvious.

[MrNomad81]

Americans went in there for greed not to help anyone but themselves

[Duobitdezo]

Who ever came up with the Petro Dollar cycle is a genius. It's pretty much a money tree.

[SDS4BO]

What IS happening though, is that the US is plunging headlong into actions that will uproot the dollar as the world reserve currency. High debt, massive entitlements, idiotic economic policies, bailouts, etc, all will contrive to unseat the dollar, likely within the next 5 years.

[SDS4BO]

I'm sorry, but this seems pretty flimsy to me. You can't start with your conclusion and then look for evidence. You have done nothing to eliminate alternative conclusions which are just as plausible. Unless you have direct evidence, not circumstantial, you can't have traction. Do you have anything like that?