Lunar Legacy Episode 1, Part 1 (Did we land on the moon?)

i have a question i hope someone might be able to help me with. if neil armstrong was the first ever man to walk down them ladders onto the moons surface!, then who the hell put the camera there first to show the world the first man walking down the ladders onto the moon?.
i mean the camera position was perfect and surely the camera wasnt attached to the LM it would have busted up apon landing.

Oil:
Is mounting a camera really THAT hard? Don't you think 400K NASA engineers and technicians could probably figure out how to mount a bracket for a camera?
Why would a camera be busted on landing? That's just stupid...like the rest of your comment. Sorry.

The camera was inside the LM and remotely extended after landing.
That was hardly a big secret, and hardly rocket science to figure out. 30 secs of googling would have told you the answer. But its exactly why even a little reading is beyond your ability that we cant take your word for any fact about the landing.

The Soviet Union sent human cells and other biological samples around the moon.
ncbi*nlm*nih*gov/pubmed/119423 58
They also took photographs and returned the photos to Earth in the Zond probes, unfogged by the Van Allen Belts radiations.
mentallandscape*com/C_CatalogM oon*htm
Cosmos 110 sent two dogs in and oput of the lower Van Allen belt for 22 days. Total dose? 12 rads.
ncbi*nlm*nih*gov/pubmed/121975 40
The Van Allen belt is not the barrier you think it is. What is your evidence it is?

Its funny, the us in 2011 will start two us all Russian spacecraft to get to space and even now the US uses Russian engines for space crafts. And yet the first country in space, fist country to have a space station still has not landed on the moon. That shows that the moon landing is questionable.

A little bit of history explains why. Three words.
N1. Go. Boom.
That is to say, the N1 rocket, the Soviet equivalent of the Saturn V, was launched 4 times, and all four times were an explosive failure. Otherwise, they likely would have been able to make it.

"questionable"

Thats highly superficial of you. The russians didnt go because their booster rocket was flawed and needed to be rebuilt from the ground up, so they said screw it and went straight to space stations.  That was hardly a big secret.

ManFromMeldbourne... did they told you about the radiation?

Actually as has been pointed out to you.
They did not manage it as their N1 rocket kept exploding on launch.
4 tries, 4 failures with one destroying the launchpad in the process.
Had it been usable they would have been able to make an attempt.

As for the Van Allen belts the Russians also demonstrated with Kosmos 110; which took two dogs repeatedly through the VABs for 22 days. From which they returned unharmed.
Although one did have a lowered sperm count for a while :)

Why? Cause their booster rockets didnt work. Had you spent 30 sec reading, you might have learned that.
Hows that radiation degree coming? ;) Good thing a real radiologist is here to give actual facts.