David Wilcock - Ascension Victim - Pseudo Science Babble
Uploader Comments (LightWarriorsUnite)
Top Comments
-
@4evalovenpeace wilcocks message is for people who cannot handle the truth. the fear of reality is one of the reasons people allow these mind control programs to sink in. wilcock has been deceived by a false god known as ra, what you call 'research', is david being coaxed into creating pseudoscience and manipulating real facts to serve the agenda. as i said, analyze any of the so called 'facts' he provides and you will find them to be false. break free from the false light and think for yourself
-
@CowKingxxx People have been programmed to spread this false concept of Ascension/Rapture for thousands of years, not just hundreds. It has caused immense damage throughout history. Many people have ruined/wasted their lives waiting for and talking about the Ascension/Rapture program. There has been groups of people in nearly every culture who have had a date they were waiting for a coming rapture or ascension. This is nothing new. I know much about Yoga, its a main topic on my channel.
All Comments (48)
-
Wilcock = another new age book-seller with opinions and beliefs and "what I think is...". We need less flakey people on the forefront of esoteria.
-
@marhuf the ascension agenda is insanely clever, before i started to wake up i believed it 100%. i preached it to people around me, even close family. thats why I dont have anything against those deceived by it. the only thing i have against wilcock is all the psuedoscience and false evidence, but like i said, he seems to actually believe it himself so its hard to hold against him.
-
@marhuf Does Wilcock offer proof or evidence concerning the nature of his contact, Ra ? No, he just makes blatant lies which can be proven false with a moments research.
-
@LightWarriorsUnite and you have proof that these so called false gods are in communication with him? Show your proof, or it's bunk. And I don't mean just your word.
-
@brroooks if you interpret the end of a cycle as being a shift, which is understandable, then what more do you need to see change to believe a shift has taken place? the world could not be anymore different than it was when the mayans made that calender.
-
@brroooks i agree he is good at meshing science fiction with supernatural but not science. he has never provided one piece of real science based evidence for any of his claims. also none of the cultures made a 2012 prophecy. the 2012 date only comes from the mayan calender and anyone educated in mayan culture will tell you there is no mention of 2012 being significant anywhere in mayan literature.
You bored me, and stopped me from wanting to learn in under 2 minutes. What kind of a setting have you chosen? wheres the music? If you can come up with a theory that explains "the sourcefield" please share it otherwise stop spreading boring dogmatic videos.
MultiCesh 1 day ago
@MultiCesh sourcefield is a perfect example of what im talking about. wilcock takes a vague concept and claims there is evidence or proof for it and that it supports the 2012 prophecies. pseudoscience overload. lies on top of lies.
LightWarriorsUnite 1 day ago
@LightWarriorsUnite no you are correct sir, the only way we will find out is by waiting. so by 2013 if jack shit has happened, then the prophecies were wrong.
brroooks 2 weeks ago 2
@brroooks precisely
LightWarriorsUnite 2 weeks ago 2