Great science. Just went thru all 12 in the series, and am praising God for scientists who are not beholden to failed, evolutionary theories. Now where is part 13?
How did the layers get tilted? They were laid down level, block faulted into mountains, worn flat, more sediments laid down level and then it was all raised up by plate tectonics over millions of years.
Geologists CAN explain the rocks we see.
Floods don't make distinct layers of different kinds of rock.
How did 21 distinct layers of rock get there for the flood to make a canyon?
1.Why aren't there kangaroos, wallabies, and wombats in Asia, and why aren't there tigers, elephants, and hoofed animals in Australia?
2.If islands like the Galapagos, New Zealand, and French Polynesia were connected to the continents, why are they dominated by animals that only could have flown in or floated in on rafts? Why don't they have large bodied animals like elephants and hooved animals?
I will say this a third time. Do you care to address a specific location? You will find in-situ trees at many locations and the conditions for their deposition varies.
Great science. Just went thru all 12 in the series, and am praising God for scientists who are not beholden to failed, evolutionary theories. Now where is part 13?
earlysda 5 months ago
science video, NOT
Plate tectonic explains the whole thing, not a flood, not water under the rocks.
This is not science, not geology.
gregrutz 1 year ago
How did the layers get tilted? They were laid down level, block faulted into mountains, worn flat, more sediments laid down level and then it was all raised up by plate tectonics over millions of years.
Geologists CAN explain the rocks we see.
Floods don't make distinct layers of different kinds of rock.
How did 21 distinct layers of rock get there for the flood to make a canyon?
gregrutz 1 year ago
I find it insulting that the description of this vid is "science video"
chattiestspike2 1 year ago
3. Why don't core samples from the ocean floor between the islands and the continents contain the remains of land animals and plants?
hallsirius 3 years ago
If this man is correct, then
1.Why aren't there kangaroos, wallabies, and wombats in Asia, and why aren't there tigers, elephants, and hoofed animals in Australia?
2.If islands like the Galapagos, New Zealand, and French Polynesia were connected to the continents, why are they dominated by animals that only could have flown in or floated in on rafts? Why don't they have large bodied animals like elephants and hooved animals?
hallsirius 3 years ago 2
lawlison- than we disagree.
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
And this is where you are wrong. I am not going to comment on generalizations.
lawilson200 4 years ago
lawlison- No the specific one does not matter. If there is just one then the evidence is there to show that the tree was rapidly buried
onlyONEtrueTRUTH 4 years ago
I will say this a third time. Do you care to address a specific location? You will find in-situ trees at many locations and the conditions for their deposition varies.
lawilson200 4 years ago